On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 00:16 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/15/2011 03:26 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
Hi folks,
http://patches.linaro.org/ went live yesterday and we need your help to set it up and get accurate metrics. It should take only a few minutes!
The first thing we need is the HTTP URL for the upstream master branch of every project on the front page -- I'll take a git:// URL if that's all they have. If you could send me the URLs for the projects you contribute to, it'd be great. This has to be done only once and we'll use that to automatically detect when a patch is committed upstream.
I've created new projects for those two. Thanks!
[ ... ]
Similarly, if any of the patches you see there have been superseded or rejected, please do mark them as such. You can do bulk changes there selecting the patches and using the form at the bottom.
Finally, although we do our best to place patches under the appropriate projects, sometimes we're not able to (e.g. when patches are sent *only* to patches@l.o), and in these cases they need to be moved manually. The list of patches for which we couldn't find a project are at
http://patches.linaro.org/patchwork/project/other-unknown/list/
The two projects are hosted at git.linaro.org and belongs to linaro. The mailing list is linaro-dev@. If I understood correctly with this email address you can't find to which project the patchset I will send for powerdebug is related to, right ?
Yep, that's correct.
I sent a patchset with "powerdebug" keyword in the subject prefix. Assuming you create the "powerdebug" project, will the next patchset go to the right project ? Or do I have to move the patchset to the right project manually using the form ?
We don't do that right now, so yes, you'll need to move them using the form. However, I think it'd be possible to match the prefix to an existing project when all else fails. A custom email header would be more robust but I understand that a prefix is probably easier to use. What do you think?
On 06/16/2011 02:45 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 00:16 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/15/2011 03:26 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
Hi folks,
http://patches.linaro.org/ went live yesterday and we need your help to set it up and get accurate metrics. It should take only a few minutes!
The first thing we need is the HTTP URL for the upstream master branch of every project on the front page -- I'll take a git:// URL if that's all they have. If you could send me the URLs for the projects you contribute to, it'd be great. This has to be done only once and we'll use that to automatically detect when a patch is committed upstream.
I've created new projects for those two. Thanks!
Thanks.
By the way, I am working for Linaro since one month, I missed I should have sent two patchset to linaro-dev@ cc'ing patches@l.o
Is there a way to "import" these patchsets into patches.linaro.org ?
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2011-June/004957.html http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2011-May/004575.html
[ ... ]
Similarly, if any of the patches you see there have been superseded or rejected, please do mark them as such. You can do bulk changes there selecting the patches and using the form at the bottom.
Finally, although we do our best to place patches under the appropriate projects, sometimes we're not able to (e.g. when patches are sent *only* to patches@l.o), and in these cases they need to be moved manually. The list of patches for which we couldn't find a project are at
http://patches.linaro.org/patchwork/project/other-unknown/list/The two projects are hosted at git.linaro.org and belongs to linaro. The mailing list is linaro-dev@. If I understood correctly with this email address you can't find to which project the patchset I will send for powerdebug is related to, right ?
Yep, that's correct.
I sent a patchset with "powerdebug" keyword in the subject prefix. Assuming you create the "powerdebug" project, will the next patchset go to the right project ? Or do I have to move the patchset to the right project manually using the form ?
We don't do that right now, so yes, you'll need to move them using the form. However, I think it'd be possible to match the prefix to an existing project when all else fails. A custom email header would be more robust but I understand that a prefix is probably easier to use. What do you think?
I don't know how to build a custom email header for git-send-email :/
I think a subject prefix is the easier way for now.
Maybe that could be nice to create a mailing list per linaro project and subscribe only linaro-dev@ to these.
Each mailing list could be configured with the project prefix, so we don't need to prefix the patches manually, that will be done automatically when redirecting the mail to linaro-dev@, so people can know what project we are talking about. I guess some configuration should be done to prevent email ping-pong between linaro-dev and the other projects mailing list.
Example: I send a patch --to powerdebug@linaro.org --cc patches@linaro.org --subject "[ PATCH 1/1 ] hello world"
linaro-dev@ will receive : -- subject "[ powerdebug ][ PATCH 1/1 ] hello world"
patches@linaro.org will receive : -- subject: "[ PATCH 1/1 ] hello world"
And you have the right --to email address to find the project the patches are related to.
No ?
ps : the mail aliases could be used for linaro-dev instead of a mailing list per project
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 16:38 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/16/2011 02:45 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 00:16 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/15/2011 03:26 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
Hi folks,
http://patches.linaro.org/ went live yesterday and we need your help to set it up and get accurate metrics. It should take only a few minutes!
The first thing we need is the HTTP URL for the upstream master branch of every project on the front page -- I'll take a git:// URL if that's all they have. If you could send me the URLs for the projects you contribute to, it'd be great. This has to be done only once and we'll use that to automatically detect when a patch is committed upstream.
I've created new projects for those two. Thanks!
Thanks.
By the way, I am working for Linaro since one month, I missed I should have sent two patchset to linaro-dev@ cc'ing patches@l.o
Is there a way to "import" these patchsets into patches.linaro.org ?
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2011-June/004957.html http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2011-May/004575.html
The only way to do that is to send them to patches@l.o. If you have the git branch where they came from handy you could git send-email them again?
[ ... ]
Similarly, if any of the patches you see there have been superseded or rejected, please do mark them as such. You can do bulk changes there selecting the patches and using the form at the bottom.
Finally, although we do our best to place patches under the appropriate projects, sometimes we're not able to (e.g. when patches are sent *only* to patches@l.o), and in these cases they need to be moved manually. The list of patches for which we couldn't find a project are at
http://patches.linaro.org/patchwork/project/other-unknown/list/The two projects are hosted at git.linaro.org and belongs to linaro. The mailing list is linaro-dev@. If I understood correctly with this email address you can't find to which project the patchset I will send for powerdebug is related to, right ?
Yep, that's correct.
I sent a patchset with "powerdebug" keyword in the subject prefix. Assuming you create the "powerdebug" project, will the next patchset go to the right project ? Or do I have to move the patchset to the right project manually using the form ?
We don't do that right now, so yes, you'll need to move them using the form. However, I think it'd be possible to match the prefix to an existing project when all else fails. A custom email header would be more robust but I understand that a prefix is probably easier to use. What do you think?
I don't know how to build a custom email header for git-send-email :/
I think a subject prefix is the easier way for now.
Maybe that could be nice to create a mailing list per linaro project and subscribe only linaro-dev@ to these.
Each mailing list could be configured with the project prefix, so we don't need to prefix the patches manually, that will be done automatically when redirecting the mail to linaro-dev@, so people can know what project we are talking about. I guess some configuration should be done to prevent email ping-pong between linaro-dev and the other projects mailing list.
Example: I send a patch --to powerdebug@linaro.org --cc patches@linaro.org --subject "[ PATCH 1/1 ] hello world"
linaro-dev@ will receive : -- subject "[ powerdebug ][ PATCH 1/1 ] hello world"
patches@linaro.org will receive : -- subject: "[ PATCH 1/1 ] hello world"
And you have the right --to email address to find the project the patches are related to.
No ?
Yep, that would work just as you describe.
ps : the mail aliases could be used for linaro-dev instead of a mailing list per project
And this makes it fairly easy to implement, but either way people will have to remember to send the patches to the project alias (which is very easy to remember, anyway) instead of linaro-dev@.
We can use powerdebug as a guinea pig for this and if it works fine we can do it for others. Do you know who we should talk to in order to get this done?
On 06/16/2011 07:42 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 16:38 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/16/2011 02:45 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 00:16 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/15/2011 03:26 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
Hi folks,
http://patches.linaro.org/ went live yesterday and we need your help to set it up and get accurate metrics. It should take only a few minutes!
The first thing we need is the HTTP URL for the upstream master branch of every project on the front page -- I'll take a git:// URL if that's all they have. If you could send me the URLs for the projects you contribute to, it'd be great. This has to be done only once and we'll use that to automatically detect when a patch is committed upstream.
I've created new projects for those two. Thanks!
Thanks.
By the way, I am working for Linaro since one month, I missed I should have sent two patchset to linaro-dev@ cc'ing patches@l.o
Is there a way to "import" these patchsets into patches.linaro.org ?
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2011-June/004957.html http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2011-May/004575.html
The only way to do that is to send them to patches@l.o. If you have the git branch where they came from handy you could git send-email them again?
Yes, sure. That will not really reflect the posting dates but I suppose it is better than nothing.
[ ... ]
Similarly, if any of the patches you see there have been superseded or rejected, please do mark them as such. You can do bulk changes there selecting the patches and using the form at the bottom.
Finally, although we do our best to place patches under the appropriate projects, sometimes we're not able to (e.g. when patches are sent *only* to patches@l.o), and in these cases they need to be moved manually. The list of patches for which we couldn't find a project are at
http://patches.linaro.org/patchwork/project/other-unknown/list/The two projects are hosted at git.linaro.org and belongs to linaro. The mailing list is linaro-dev@. If I understood correctly with this email address you can't find to which project the patchset I will send for powerdebug is related to, right ?
Yep, that's correct.
I sent a patchset with "powerdebug" keyword in the subject prefix. Assuming you create the "powerdebug" project, will the next patchset go to the right project ? Or do I have to move the patchset to the right project manually using the form ?
We don't do that right now, so yes, you'll need to move them using the form. However, I think it'd be possible to match the prefix to an existing project when all else fails. A custom email header would be more robust but I understand that a prefix is probably easier to use. What do you think?
I don't know how to build a custom email header for git-send-email :/
I think a subject prefix is the easier way for now.
Maybe that could be nice to create a mailing list per linaro project and subscribe only linaro-dev@ to these.
Each mailing list could be configured with the project prefix, so we don't need to prefix the patches manually, that will be done automatically when redirecting the mail to linaro-dev@, so people can know what project we are talking about. I guess some configuration should be done to prevent email ping-pong between linaro-dev and the other projects mailing list.
Example: I send a patch --to powerdebug@linaro.org --cc patches@linaro.org --subject "[ PATCH 1/1 ] hello world"
linaro-dev@ will receive : -- subject "[ powerdebug ][ PATCH 1/1 ] hello world"
patches@linaro.org will receive : -- subject: "[ PATCH 1/1 ] hello world"
And you have the right --to email address to find the project the patches are related to.
No ?
Yep, that would work just as you describe.
ps : the mail aliases could be used for linaro-dev instead of a mailing list per project
And this makes it fairly easy to implement, but either way people will have to remember to send the patches to the project alias (which is very easy to remember, anyway) instead of linaro-dev@.
Yeah, if they send to the wrong address the patches will go to "unknow" and that will end up to the senders to move the patches to the right project.
We can use powerdebug as a guinea pig for this and if it works fine we can do it for others. Do you know who we should talk to in order to get this done?
I think we can create a mailing list [1] but an alias is better IMO. The latter should fall under the IT umbrella. Maybe we can ask to mailman@lists.linaro.org ...
On 06/16/2011 07:42 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
[ ... ]
We can use powerdebug as a guinea pig for this and if it works fine we can do it for others. Do you know who we should talk to in order to get this done?
Hi Guilherme,
I have no problem to use powerdebug to validate this approach.
Did you asked to the mailman administrator [1] to add a powerdebug email alias for linaro-dev ?
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:23 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/16/2011 07:42 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
[ ... ]
We can use powerdebug as a guinea pig for this and if it works fine we can do it for others. Do you know who we should talk to in order to get this done?
Hi Guilherme,
I have no problem to use powerdebug to validate this approach.
Did you asked to the mailman administrator [1] to add a powerdebug email alias for linaro-dev ?
I was thinking of having powerdebug@linaro.org as a regular mail account forwarding everything to linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; that wouldn't need to be done on mailman. Do you see any reason for doing it on mailman? Maybe powerdebug@lists.linaro.org would make more sense?
Cheers,
On 06/21/2011 03:09 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 11:23 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/16/2011 07:42 PM, Guilherme Salgado wrote:
[ ... ]
We can use powerdebug as a guinea pig for this and if it works fine we can do it for others. Do you know who we should talk to in order to get this done?
Hi Guilherme,
I have no problem to use powerdebug to validate this approach.
Did you asked to the mailman administrator [1] to add a powerdebug email alias for linaro-dev ?
I was thinking of having powerdebug@linaro.org as a regular mail account forwarding everything to linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org; that wouldn't need to be done on mailman. Do you see any reason for doing it on mailman? Maybe powerdebug@lists.linaro.org would make more sense?
I can't create a powerdebug@linaro.org or powerdebug@lists.linaro.org mail address. We should ask to the mailman admin or IT what is the better approach.
I Cc'ed Amit which is the tech lead of the power management team.
Amit ?
we would like, Guilherme and I, to create a specific mail address for powerdebug so patchwork can correctly put the patches to the right project instead of "other-unknown".
We thought we can create a mailing list for powerdebug and subscribe only the linaro-dev mailing list. When we send the patches to powerdebug@linaro.org, cc'ing patches@linaro.org. The latter will determine to which project the patches belong to and at the same time the patches will fall into the linaro-dev mailing list.
If the result is what we expect with powerdebug, Guilherme would like to extend this approach to all linaro projects.
What do you think ?
Thanks -- Daniel
-
Daniel Lezcano -
Guilherme Salgado