On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org wrote:
- drm dma-buf prime support. Dave Airlie sent me the pull request but didn't push very hard for it, it's in my "ok, I can still pull it for 3.4 if individual DRM driver people tell me that it will make their lives easier." So this is in limbo - I have nothing against it, but I won't pull unless I get a few people say "yes, please".
yes, please :-)
Note that the core drm dma-buf/prime support has already been reviewed by a lot of folks, and tested with a few different drivers (exynos, omapdrm, i915, nouveau, udl) with some driver support that could be pushed for 3.5 cycle if the core support makes it in for 3.4 cycle.
BR, -R
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Rob Clark rob.clark@linaro.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org wrote:
- drm dma-buf prime support. Dave Airlie sent me the pull request but didn't push very hard for it, it's in my "ok, I can still pull it for 3.4 if individual DRM driver people tell me that it will make their lives easier." So this is in limbo - I have nothing against it, but I won't pull unless I get a few people say "yes, please".
yes, please :-)
Note that the core drm dma-buf/prime support has already been reviewed by a lot of folks, and tested with a few different drivers (exynos, omapdrm, i915, nouveau, udl) with some driver support that could be pushed for 3.5 cycle if the core support makes it in for 3.4 cycle.
Yes, Please.
It's used for exynos display and multimedia.
Thank you, Kyungmin Park
BR, -R
linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:40:39PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Rob Clark rob.clark@linaro.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org wrote:
- drm dma-buf prime support. Dave Airlie sent me the pull request but didn't push very hard for it, it's in my "ok, I can still pull it for 3.4 if individual DRM driver people tell me that it will make their lives easier." So this is in limbo - I have nothing against it, but I won't pull unless I get a few people say "yes, please".
yes, please :-)
Note that the core drm dma-buf/prime support has already been reviewed by a lot of folks, and tested with a few different drivers (exynos, omapdrm, i915, nouveau, udl) with some driver support that could be pushed for 3.5 cycle if the core support makes it in for 3.4 cycle.
Yes, Please.
It's used for exynos display and multimedia.
Thirded.
There are a lot of loose pieces to juggle until we have everything in place for buffer sharing (and quite a few of this involve contentious topics). But this core piece for integrating dma-buf with drm here has been acked/reviewd by all the relevant people and merging it would imo greatly help in wiring up all the other loose ends.
Cheers, Daniel
On 04/02/2012 02:11 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:40:39PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Rob Clarkrob.clark@linaro.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org wrote:
- drm dma-buf prime support. Dave Airlie sent me the pull request but
didn't push very hard for it, it's in my "ok, I can still pull it for 3.4 if individual DRM driver people tell me that it will make their lives easier." So this is in limbo - I have nothing against it, but I won't pull unless I get a few people say "yes, please".
yes, please :-)
Note that the core drm dma-buf/prime support has already been reviewed by a lot of folks, and tested with a few different drivers (exynos, omapdrm, i915, nouveau, udl) with some driver support that could be pushed for 3.5 cycle if the core support makes it in for 3.4 cycle.
Yes, Please.
It's used for exynos display and multimedia.
Thirded.
There are a lot of loose pieces to juggle until we have everything in place for buffer sharing (and quite a few of this involve contentious topics). But this core piece for integrating dma-buf with drm here has been acked/reviewd by all the relevant people and merging it would imo greatly help in wiring up all the other loose ends.
Cheers, Daniel
(yes, please) ++
I have been using the dma-buf with dma-mapping(Marek's patches) on origen(exynos4210), and basic things are good. I wish this gets into kernel along with the dma-mapping support asap.
Regards, Subash
@Subash Patel, prime is already included.
Why the CMA is at 24 version and still not included ? Linus, please include CMA,git://git.linaro.org/people/mszyprowski/linux-dma-mapping.git 3.4-rc1-cma-v24
Hi,
On Wednesday, April 04, 2012 2:34 PM Anca Emanuel
@Subash Patel, prime is already included.
Why the CMA is at 24 version and still not included ? Linus, please include CMA,git://git.linaro.org/people/mszyprowski/linux-dma-mapping.git 3.4-rc1-cma-v24
CMA is expected to be merged via akpm tree together with other core memory management patches. I got a message that Andrew Morton scheduled it for v3.5 kernel, so it should be soon available in linux-next tree.
Best regards
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Rob Clark rob.clark@linaro.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org wrote:
- drm dma-buf prime support. Dave Airlie sent me the pull request but didn't push very hard for it, it's in my "ok, I can still pull it for 3.4 if individual DRM driver people tell me that it will make their lives easier." So this is in limbo - I have nothing against it, but I won't pull unless I get a few people say "yes, please".
yes, please :-)
Note that the core drm dma-buf/prime support has already been reviewed by a lot of folks, and tested with a few different drivers (exynos, omapdrm, i915, nouveau, udl) with some driver support that could be pushed for 3.5 cycle if the core support makes it in for 3.4 cycle.
Please. It's the first step in making hybrid laptops work properly in Linux.
Alex
-
Alex Deucher -
Anca Emanuel -
Daniel Vetter -
Kyungmin Park -
Marek Szyprowski -
Rob Clark -
Subash Patel