From: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org
This creates a subsystem for handling of pin control devices. These are devices that control different aspects of package pins.
Currently it handled pinmuxing, i.e. assign electronic functions to groups of pins of pins on primarily PGA and BGA type of chip packages and common in embedded systems.
The plan is to also handle other I/O pin control aspects such as biasing, driving, input properties such as schmitt-triggering, load capacitance etc within this subsystem.
This is being done to depopulate the arch/arm/* directory of such custom drivers and try to abstract the infrastructure they all need. See the Documentation/pinmux.txt file that is part of this patch for more details.
Cc: Grant Likely grant.likely@secretlab.ca Cc: Stephen Warren swarren@nvidia.com Cc: Joe Perches joe@perches.com Cc: Russell King linux@arm.linux.org.uk Tested-by: Barry Song 21cnbao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org --- ChangeLog v5->v6:
- Create an abstract pin group concept that can sort pins into named and enumerated groups no matter what the use of these groups may be, one possible usecase is a group of pins being muxed in or so. The intention is however to also use these groups for other pin control activities.
- Make it compulsory for pinmux functions to associate with at least one group, so the abstract pin group concept is used to define the groups of pins affected by a pinmux function. The pinmux driver interface has been altered so as to enforce a function to list applicable groups per function.
- Provide an optional .group entry in the pinmux machine map so the map can select beteween different available groups to be used with a certain function.
- Consequent changes all over the place so that e.g. debugfs present reasonable information about the world.
- Drop the per-pin mux (*config) function in the pinmux_ops struct - I was afraid that this would start to be used for things totally unrelated to muxing, we can introduce that to the generic struct pinctrl_ops if needed. I want to keep muxing orthogonal to other pin control subjects and not mix these things up. --- Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-pinmux | 11 + Documentation/pinctrl.txt | 876 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ MAINTAINERS | 5 + drivers/Kconfig | 4 + drivers/Makefile | 2 + drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 29 + drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 6 + drivers/pinctrl/core.c | 599 ++++++++++++++++++ drivers/pinctrl/core.h | 24 + drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c | 822 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h | 4 + include/linux/pinctrl/machine.h | 73 +++ include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h | 172 +++++ include/linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h | 124 ++++ 14 files changed, 2751 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-pinmux create mode 100644 Documentation/pinctrl.txt create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/Makefile create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/core.c create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/core.h create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h create mode 100644 include/linux/pinctrl/machine.h create mode 100644 include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h create mode 100644 include/linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h
diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-pinmux b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-pinmux new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c2ea843 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-pinmux @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +What: /sys/class/pinmux/.../name +Date: May 2011 +KernelVersion: 3.1 +Contact: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org +Description: + Each pinmux directory will contain a field called + name. This holds a string identifying the pinmux for + display purposes. + + NOTE: this will be empty if no suitable name is provided + by platform or pinmux drivers. diff --git a/Documentation/pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5446d30 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt @@ -0,0 +1,876 @@ +PINCTRL (PIN CONTROL) subsystem +This document outlines the pin control subsystem in Linux + +This subsystem deals with: + +- Enumerating and naming controllable pins + +- Multiplexing of pins, pads, fingers (etc) see below for details + +The intention is to also deal with: + +- Software-controlled biasing and driving mode specific pins, such as + pull-up/down, open drain etc, load capacitance configuration when controlled + by software, etc. + + +Top-level interface +=================== + +Definition of PIN CONTROLLER: + +- A pin controller is a piece of hardware, usually a set of registers, that + can control PINs. It may be able to multiplex, bias, set load capacitance, + set drive strength etc for individual pins or groups of pins. + +Definition of PIN: + +- PINS are equal to pads, fingers, balls or whatever packaging input or + output line you want to control and these are denoted by unsigned integers + in the range 0..maxpin. This numberspace is local to each PIN CONTROLLER, so + there may be several such number spaces in a system. This pin space may + be sparse - i.e. there may be gaps in the space with numbers where no + pin exists. + +When a PIN CONTROLLER is instatiated, it will register a descriptor to the +pin control framework, and this descriptor contains an array of pin descriptors +describing the pins handled by this specific pin controller. + +Here is an example of a PGA (Pin Grid Array) chip seen from underneath: + + A B C D E F G H + + 8 o o o o o o o o + + 7 o o o o o o o o + + 6 o o o o o o o o + + 5 o o o o o o o o + + 4 o o o o o o o o + + 3 o o o o o o o o + + 2 o o o o o o o o + + 1 o o o o o o o o + +To register a pin controller and name all the pins on this package we can do +this in our driver: + +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h> + +const struct pinctrl_pin_desc __refdata foo_pins[] = { + PINCTRL_PIN(0, "A1"), + PINCTRL_PIN(1, "A2"), + PINCTRL_PIN(2, "A3"), + ... + PINCTRL_PIN(61, "H6"), + PINCTRL_PIN(62, "H7"), + PINCTRL_PIN(63, "H8"), +}; + +static struct pinctrl_desc foo_desc = { + .name = "foo", + .pins = foo_pins, + .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(foo_pins), + .maxpin = 63, + .owner = THIS_MODULE, +}; + +int __init foo_probe(void) +{ + struct pinctrl_dev *pctl; + + pctl = pinctrl_register(&foo_desc, <PARENT>, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(pctl)) + pr_err("could not register foo pin driver\n"); +} + +Pins usually have fancier names than this. You can find these in the dataheet +for your chip. Notice that the core pinctrl.h file provides a fancy macro +called PINCTRL_PIN() to create the struct entries. As you can see I enumerated +the pins from 0 in the upper left corner to 63 in the lower right corner, +this enumeration was arbitrarily chosen, in practice you need to think +through your numbering system so that it matches the layout of registers +and such things in your driver, or the code may become complicated. You must +also consider matching of offsets to the GPIO ranges that may be handled by +the pin controller. + +For a padring with 467 pads, as opposed to actual pins, I used an enumeration +like this, walking around the edge of the chip, which seems to be industry +standard too (all these pads had names, too): + + + 0 ..... 104 + 466 105 + . . + . . + 358 224 + 357 .... 225 + + +Pin groups +========== + +Many controllers need to deal with groups of pins, so the pin controller +subsystem has a mechanism for enumerating groups of pins and retrieving the +actual enumerated pins that are part of a certain group. + +For example, say that we have a group of pins dealing with an SPI interface +on { 0, 8, 16, 24 }, and a group of pins dealing with an I2C interface on pins +on { 24, 25 }. + +These two groups are presented to the pin control subsystem by implementing +some generic pinctrl_ops like this: + +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h> + +struct foo_group { + const char *name; + const unsigned int *pins; + const unsigned num_pins; +}; + +static unsigned int spi0_pins[] = { 0, 8, 16, 24 }; +static unsigned int i2c0_pins[] = { 24, 25 }; + +static const struct foo_group foo_groups[] = { + { + .name = "spi0_grp", + .pins = spi0_pins, + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(spi0_pins), + }, + { + .name = "i2c0_grp", + .pins = i2c0_pins, + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(i2c0_pins), + }, +}; + + +static int foo_list_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector) +{ + if (selector >= ARRAY_SIZE(foo_groups)) + return -EINVAL; + return 0; +} + +static const char *foo_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + unsigned selector) +{ + return foo_groups[selector].name; +} + +static int foo_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector, + unsigned ** const pins, + unsigned * const num_pins) +{ + *pins = (unsigned *) foo_groups[selector].pins; + *num_pins = foo_groups[selector].num_pins; + return 0; +} + +static struct pinctrl_ops foo_pctrl_ops = { + .list_groups = foo_list_groups, + .get_group_name = foo_get_group_name, + .get_group_pins = foo_get_group_pins, +}; + + +static struct pinctrl_desc foo_desc = { + ... + .pctlops = &foo_pctrl_ops, +}; + +The pin control subsystem will call the .list_groups() function repeatedly +beginning on 0 until it returns non-zero to determine legal selectors, then +it will call the other functions to retrieve the name and pins of the group. +Maintaining the data structure of the groups is up to the driver, this is +just a simple example - in practice you may need more entries in your group +structure, for example specific register ranges associated with each group +and so on. + + +Interaction with the GPIO subsystem +=================================== + +The GPIO drivers may want to perform operations of various types on the same +physical pins that are also registered as GPIO pins. + +Since the pin controller subsystem have its pinspace local to the pin +controller we need a mapping so that the pin control subsystem can figure out +which pin controller handles control of a certain GPIO pin. Since a single +pin controller may be muxing several GPIO ranges (typically SoCs that have +one set of pins but internally several GPIO silicon blocks, each modeled as +a struct gpio_chip) any number of GPIO ranges can be added to a pin controller +instance like this: + +struct gpio_chip chip_a; +struct gpio_chip chip_b; + +static struct pinctrl_gpio_range gpio_range_a = { + .name = "chip a", + .id = 0, + .base = 32, + .npins = 16, + .gc = &chip_a; +}; + +static struct pinctrl_gpio_range gpio_range_a = { + .name = "chip b", + .id = 0, + .base = 48, + .npins = 8, + .gc = &chip_b; +}; + + +{ + struct pinctrl_dev *pctl; + ... + pinctrl_add_gpio_range(pctl, &gpio_range_a); + pinctrl_add_gpio_range(pctl, &gpio_range_b); +} + +So this complex system has one pin controller handling two different +GPIO chips. Chip a has 16 pins and chip b has 8 pins. They are mapped in +the global GPIO pin space at: + +chip a: [32 .. 47] +chip b: [48 .. 55] + +When GPIO-specific functions in the pin control subsystem are called, these +ranges will be used to look up the apropriate pin controller by inspecting +and matching the pin to the pin ranges across all controllers. When a +pin controller handling the matching range is found, GPIO-specific functions +will be called on that specific pin controller. + +For all functionalities dealing with pin biasing, pin muxing etc, the pin +controller subsystem will subtract the range's .base offset from the passed +in gpio pin number, and pass that on to the pin control driver, so the driver +will get an offset into its handled number range. Further it is also passed +the range ID value, so that the pin controller knows which range it should +deal with. + +For example: if a user issues pinctrl_gpio_set_foo(50), the pin control +subsystem will find that the second range on this pin controller matches, +subtract the base 48 and call the +pinctrl_driver_gpio_set_foo(pinctrl, range, 2) where the latter function has +this signature: + +int pinctrl_driver_gpio_set_foo(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + struct pinctrl_gpio_range *rangeid, + unsigned offset); + +Now the driver knows that we want to do some GPIO-specific operation on the +second GPIO range handled by "chip b", at offset 2 in that specific range. + +(If the GPIO subsystem is ever refactored to use a local per-GPIO controller +pin space, this mapping will need to be augmented accordingly.) + + +PINMUX interfaces +================= + +These calls use the pinmux_* naming prefix. No other calls should use that +prefix. + + +What is pinmuxing? +================== + +PINMUX, also known as padmux, ballmux, alternate functions or mission modes +is a way for chip vendors producing some kind of electrical packages to use +a certain physical pin (ball, pad, finger, etc) for multiple mutually exclusive +functions, depending on the application. By "application" in this context +we usually mean a way of soldering or wiring the package into an electronic +system, even though the framework makes it possible to also change the function +at runtime. + +Here is an example of a PGA (Pin Grid Array) chip seen from underneath: + + A B C D E F G H + +---+ + 8 | o | o o o o o o o + | | + 7 | o | o o o o o o o + | | + 6 | o | o o o o o o o + +---+---+ + 5 | o | o | o o o o o o + +---+---+ +---+ + 4 o o o o o o | o | o + | | + 3 o o o o o o | o | o + | | + 2 o o o o o o | o | o + +-------+-------+-------+---+---+ + 1 | o o | o o | o o | o | o | + +-------+-------+-------+---+---+ + +This is not tetris. The game to think of is chess. Not all PGA/BGA packages +are chessboard-like, big ones have "holes" in some arrangement according to +different design patterns, but we're using this as a simple example. Of the +pins you see some will be taken by things like a few VCC and GND to feed power +to the chip, and quite a few will be taken by large ports like an external +memory interface. The remaining pins will often be subject to pin multiplexing. + +The example 8x8 PGA package above will have pin numbers 0 thru 63 assigned to +its physical pins. It will name the pins { A1, A2, A3 ... H6, H7, H8 } using +pinctrl_register_pins_[sparse|dense]() and a suitable data set as shown +earlier. + +In this 8x8 BGA package the pins { A8, A7, A6, A5 } can be used as an SPI port +(these are four pins: CLK, RXD, TXD, FRM). In that case, pin B5 can be used as +some general-purpose GPIO pin. However, in another setting, pins { A5, B5 } can +be used as an I2C port (these are just two pins: SCL, SDA). Needless to say, +we cannot use the SPI port and I2C port at the same time. However in the inside +of the package the silicon performing the SPI logic can alternatively be routed +out on pins { G4, G3, G2, G1 }. + +On the botton row at { A1, B1, C1, D1, E1, F1, G1, H1 } we have something +special - it's an external MMC bus that can be 2, 4 or 8 bits wide, and it will +consume 2, 4 or 8 pins respectively, so either { A1, B1 } are taken or +{ A1, B1, C1, D1 } or all of them. If we use all 8 bits, we cannot use the SPI +port on pins { G4, G3, G2, G1 } of course. + +This way the silicon blocks present inside the chip can be multiplexed "muxed" +out on different pin ranges. Often contemporary SoC (systems on chip) will +contain several I2C, SPI, SDIO/MMC, etc silicon blocks that can be routed to +different pins by pinmux settings. + +Since general-purpose I/O pins (GPIO) are typically always in shortage, it is +common to be able to use almost any pin as a GPIO pin if it is not currently +in use by some other I/O port. + + +Pinmux conventions +================== + +The purpose of the pinmux functionality in the pin controller subsystem is to +abstract and provide pinmux settings to the devices you choose to instantiate +in your machine configuration. It is inspired by the clk, GPIO and regulator +subsystems, so devices will request their mux setting, but it's also possible +to request a single pin for e.g. GPIO. + +Definitions: + +- FUNCTIONS can be switched in and out by a driver residing with the pin + control subsystem in the drivers/pinctrl/* directory of the kernel. The + pin control driver knows the possible functions. In the example above you can + identify three pinmux functions, one for spi, one for i2c and one for mmc. + +- FUNCTIONS are assumed to be enumerable from zero in a one-dimensional array. + In this case the array could be something like: { spi0, i2c0, mmc0 } + for the three available functions. + +- FUNCTIONS have PIN GROUPS as defined on the generic level - so a certain + function is *always* associated with a certain set of pin groups, could + be just a single one, but could also be many. In the example above the + function i2c is associated with the pins { A5, B5 }, enumerated as + { 24, 25 } in the controller pin space. + + The Function spi is associated with pin groups { A8, A7, A6, A5 } + and { G4, G3, G2, G1 }, which are enumerated as { 0, 8, 16, 24 } and + { 38, 46, 54, 62 } respectively. + +- The combination of a FUNCTION and a PIN GROUP determine a certain function + for a certain set of pins. The knowledge of the functions and pin groups + and their machine-specific particulars are kept inside the pinmux driver, + from the outside only the enumerators are known, and the driver core can: + + - Request the name of a function with a certain selector (>= 0) + - A list of groups associated with a certain function + - Request that a certain group in that list to be activated for a certain + function + + As already described above, pin groups are in turn self-descriptive, so + the core will retrieve the actual pin range in a certain group from the + driver. + +- FUNCTIONS and GROUPS on a certain PIN CONTROLLER are MAPPED to a certain + device by the board file, device tree or similar machine setup configuration + mechanism, similar to how regulators are connected to devices, usually by + name. Defining a pin controller, function and group thus uniquely identify + the set of pins to be used by a certain device. (If only one possible group + of pins is available for the function, no group name need to be supplied - + the core will simply select the first and only group available.) + + In the example case we can define that this particular machine shall + use device spi0 with pinmux function fspi0 group gspi0 and i2c0 on function + fi2c0 group gi2c0, on the primary pin controller, we get quadruple mappings + like these: + { {spi0, pinctrl0, fspi0, gspi0}, {i2c0, pinctrl0, fi2c0, gi2c0} } + +- FUNCTIONS using a certain PIN GROUP on a certain PIN CONTROLLER are provided + on a first-come first-serve basis, so if some other device mux setting or + GPIO pin request has already taken your physical pin, you will be denied the + use of it. To get (activate) a new setting, the old one has to be put + (deactivated) first. + +Sometimes the documentation and hardware registers will be oriented around +pads (or "fingers") rather than pins - these are the soldering surfaces on the +silicon inside the package, and may or may not match the actual number of +pins/balls underneath the capsule. Pick some enumeration that makes sense to +you. Define enumerators only for the pins you can control if that makes sense. + +Assumptions: + +We assume that the number possible function maps to pin groups is limited by +the hardware. I.e. we assume that there is no system where any function can be +mapped to any pin, like in a phone exchange. So the available pins groups for +a certain function will be limited to a few choices (say up to eight or so), +not hundreds or any amount of choices. This is the characteristic we have found +by inspecting available pinmux hardware, and a necessary assumption since we +expect pinmux drivers to present *all* possible function vs pin group mappings +to the subsystem. + + +Pinmux drivers +============== + +It is the responsibility of the pinmux driver to determine whether or not +the requested function can actually be enabled, and in that case poke the +hardware so that this happens. + +The driver will for all calls be provided an offset pin number into its own +pin range. If you have 2 chips with 8x8 pins, the first chips pins will have +numbers 0 thru 63 and the second one pins 64 thru 127, but the driver for the +second chip will be passed numbers in the range 0 thru 63 anyway, base offset +subtracted. + +Pinmux drivers are required to supply a few callback functions, some are +optional. Usually the enable() and disable() functions are implemented, +writing values into some certain registers to activate a certain mux setting +for a certain pin. + +A simple driver for the above example will work by setting bits 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4 +into some register named MUX to select a certain function on a certain position +would works something like this: + +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h> +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h> + +struct foo_group { + const char *name; + const unsigned int *pins; + const unsigned num_pins; +}; + +static unsigned int spi0_0_pins[] = { 0, 8, 16, 24 }; +static unsigned int spi0_1_pins[] = { 38, 46, 54, 62 }; +static unsigned int i2c0_pins[] = { 24, 25 }; +static unsigned int mmc0_1_pins[] = { 56, 57 }; +static unsigned int mmc0_2_pins[] = { 56, 57, 58, 59 }; +static unsigned int mmc0_3_pins[] = { 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 }; + +static const struct foo_group foo_groups[] = { + { + .name = "spi0_0_grp", + .pins = spi0_0_pins, + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(spi0_0_pins), + }, + { + .name = "spi0_1_grp", + .pins = spi0_1_pins, + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(spi0_1_pins), + }, + { + .name = "i2c0_grp", + .pins = i2c0_pins, + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(i2c0_pins), + }, + { + .name = "mmc0_1_grp", + .pins = mmc0_1_pins, + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(mmc0_1_pins), + }, + { + .name = "mmc0_2_grp", + .pins = mmc0_2_pins, + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(mmc0_2_pins), + }, + { + .name = "mmc0_3_grp", + .pins = mmc0_3_pins, + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(mmc0_3_pins), + }, +}; + + +static int foo_list_groups(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector) +{ + if (selector >= ARRAY_SIZE(foo_groups)) + return -EINVAL; + return 0; +} + +static const char *foo_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + unsigned selector) +{ + return foo_groups[selector].name; +} + +static int foo_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector, + unsigned ** const pins, + unsigned * const num_pins) +{ + *pins = (unsigned *) foo_groups[selector].pins; + *num_pins = foo_groups[selector].num_pins; + return 0; +} + +static struct pinctrl_ops foo_pctrl_ops = { + .list_groups = foo_list_groups, + .get_group_name = foo_get_group_name, + .get_group_pins = foo_get_group_pins, +}; + +TODO: presentation... +struct foo_pmx_func { + char *name; + char * + unsigned num_positions; +}; + +static struct foo_pmx_position spi0_positions[] = { + { + .pos = 0, + .pins = spi0_0_pins, + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(spi0_1_pins), + .regbit = 0x01, + }, + { + .pos = 1, + .pins = spi0_1_pins, + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(spi0_1_pins), + .regbit = 0x02, + }, +}; + +static struct foo_pmx_position i2c0_positions[] = { + { + .pos = 0, + .pins = i2c0_pins, + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(spi0_1_pins), + .regbit = 0x04, + }, +}; + + +static struct foo_pmx_position mmc0_positions[] = { + { + .pos = 0, + .pins = mmc0_1_pins, + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(mmc0_1_pins), + .regbit = 0x08, + }, + { + .pos = 1, + .pins = mmc0_2_pins, + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(mmc0_2_pins), + .regbit = 0x10, + }, + { + .pos = 2, + .pins = mmc0_3_pins, + .num_pins = ARRAY_SIZE(mmc0_3_pins), + .regbit = 0x20, + }, +}; + +static struct foo_pmx_func myfuncs[] = { + { + .name = "spi0", + .positions = spi0_positions, + .num_positions = ARRAY_SIZE(spi0_positions), + }, + { + .name = "i2c0", + .positions = i2c0_positions, + .num_positions = ARRAY_SIZE(i2c0_positions), + }, + { + .name = "mmc0", + .positions = mmc0_positions, + .num_positions = ARRAY_SIZE(mmc0_positions), + }, +}; + +int foo_list_funcs(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector) +{ + if (selector >= ARRAY_SIZE(myfuncs)) + return -EINVAL; + return 0; +} + +int foo_list_positions(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector, + unsigned position) +{ + if (selector >= ARRAY_SIZE(myfuncs)) + return -EINVAL; + if (position >= myfuncs[selector].num_positions) + return -EINVAL; + return 0; +} + +const char *foo_get_fname(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector) +{ + return myfuncs[selector].name; +} + +static int foo_get_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector, + unsigned position, unsigned ** const pins, + unsigned * const num_pins) +{ + *pins = myfuncs[selector].positions[position].pins; + *num_pins = myfuncs[selector].positions[position].num_pins; + return 0; +} + +int foo_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector, + unsigned position) +{ + u8 regbit = myfuncs[selector].positions[position].regbit; + + writeb((readb(MUX)|regbit), MUX) + return 0; +} + +int foo_disable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector, + unsigned position) +{ + u8 regbit = myfuncs[selector].positions[position].regbit; + + writeb((readb(MUX) & ~(regbit)), MUX) + return 0; +} + +struct pinmux_ops foo_pmxops = { + .list_functions = foo_list_funcs, + .list_positions = foo_list_positions, + .get_function_name = foo_get_fname, + .get_function_pins = foo_get_pins, + .enable = foo_enable, + .disable = foo_disable, +}; + +/* Pinmux operations are handled by some pin controller */ +static struct pinctrl_desc foo_desc = { + ... + .pctlops = &foo_pctrl_ops, + .pmxops = &foo_pmxops, +}; + +Now the able reader will say: "wait - the driver needs to make sure it +can set this and that bit at the same time, because else it will collide +and wreak havoc in my electronics, and make sure noone else is using the +other setting that it's incompatible with". + +In the example activating muxing 0 and 1 at the same time setting bits +0 and 1, uses one pin in common so they would collide. + +The beauty of the pinmux subsystem is that since it keeps track of all +pins and who is using them, it will already have denied an impossible +request like that, so the driver does not need to worry about such +things - when it gets a selector passed in, the pinmux subsystem makes +sure no other device or GPIO assignment is already using the selected +pins. + +The above functions except .list_positions are mandatory to implement for +a pinmux driver. For hardware where each function can only exist in one +position, you can omit this functions, and position 0 will be passed to all +calls. + + +Pinmux interaction with the GPIO subsystem +========================================== + +The function list could become long, especially if you can convert every +individual pin into a GPIO pin independent of any other pins, then your +function array can become 64 entries for each GPIO setting and then the +device functions. For this reason there is an additional function you +can implement to enable only GPIO on an individual pin: pinmux_request_gpio() +and pinmux_free_gpio(). + +These functions use the .gpio_base and .gpio_pins members of the pin +controller as described above for the pin controller, to look up the target +pin controller. + + +Pinmux board/machine configuration +================================== + +Boards and machines define how a certain complete running system is put +together, including how GPIOs and devices are muxed, how regulators are +constrained and how the clock tree looks. Of course pinmux settings are also +part of this. + +A pinmux config for a machine looks pretty much like a simple regulator +configuration, so for the example array above we want to enable i2c and +spi on the second function mapping: + +#include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h> + +static struct pinmux_map pmx_mapping[] = { + { + .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl.0", + .function = "spi0", + .position = 1, + .dev_name = "foo-spi.0", + }, + { + .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl.0", + .function = "i2c0", + .position = 0, + .dev_name = "foo-i2c.0", + }, + { + .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl.0", + .function = "mmc0", + .position = 1, + .dev_name = "foo-mmc.0", + }, +}; + +As you can see we may have several pin controllers on the system and thus +we need to specify which one of them that contain the functions we wish +to map. The map can also use struct device * directly, so there is no +inherent need to use strings to specify .dev_name or .ctrl_dev_name, these +are for the situation where you do not have a handle to the struct device *, +for example if they are not yet instantiated or cumbersome to obtain. + +Since the above construct is pretty common there is a helper macro to make +it even more compact which assumes you want to use pinctrl.0 and position +0 for mapping, for example: + +static struct pinmux_map pmx_mapping[] = { + PINMUX_MAP_PRIMARY("i2c0", "foo-i2c.0"), +}; + +The dev_name here matches to the unique device name that can be used to look +up the device struct (just like with clockdev or regulators). The function name +must match a function provided by the pinmux driver handling this pin range. +You register this pinmux mapping to the pinmux subsystem by simply: + + ret = pinmux_register_mappings(&pmx_mapping, ARRAY_SIZE(pmx_mapping)); + + +Pinmux requests from drivers +============================ + +A driver may request a certain mux to be activated, usually just the default +mux like this: + +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h> + +struct foo_state { + struct pinmux *pmx; + ... +}; + +foo_probe() +{ + /* Allocate a state holder named "state" etc */ + struct pinmux pmx; + + pmx = pinmux_get(&device, NULL); + if IS_ERR(pmx) + return PTR_ERR(pmx); + pinmux_enable(pmx); + + state->pmx = pmx; +} + +foo_remove() +{ + pinmux_disable(state->pmx); + pinmux_put(state->pmx); +} + +If you want to grab a specific mux mapping and not just the first one found for +this device you can specify a specific mapping name, for example in the above +example the second i2c0 setting: pinmux_get(&device, "spi0-pos-B"); + +This get/enable/disable/put sequence can just as well be handled by bus drivers +if you don't want each and every driver to handle it and you know the +arrangement on your bus. + +The semantics of the get/enable respective disable/put is as follows: + +- pinmux_get() is called in process context to reserve the pins affected with + a certain mapping and set up the pinmux core and the driver. It will allocate + a struct from the kernel memory to hold the pinmux state. + +- pinmux_enable()/pinmux_disable() is quick and can be called from fastpath + (irq context) when you quickly want to set up/tear down the hardware muxing + when running a device driver. Usually it will just poke some values into a + register. + +- pinmux_disable() is called in process context to tear down the pin requests + and release the state holder struct for the mux setting. + +Usually the pinmux core handled the get/put pair and call out to the device +drivers bookkeeping operations, like checking available functions and the +associated pins, whereas the enable/disable pass on to the pin controller +driver which takes care of activating and/or deactivating the mux setting by +quickly poking some registers. + +The pins are allocated for your device when you issue the pinmux_get() call, +after this you should be able to see this in the debugfs listing of all pins. + + +Runtime pinmuxing +================= + +It is possible to mux a certain function in and out at runtime, say to move +an SPI port from one set of pins to another set of pins. Say for example for +spi0 in the example above, we expose two different positions in the mapping +to achieve this: + +static struct pinmux_map pmx_mapping[] = { + { + .name = "spi0-pos-A", + .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl.0", + .function = "spi0", + .position = 0, + .dev_name = "foo-spi.0", + }, + { + .name = "spi0-pos-B", + .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl.0", + .function = "spi0", + .position = 1, + .dev_name = "foo-spi.0", + }, + ... +}; + +This snippet first muxes the function in position A, enables it, disables +and releases it, and muxes it in on position B: + +foo_switch() +{ + struct pinmux pmx; + + /* Enable on position A */ + pmx = pinmux_get(&device, "spi0-pos-A"); + if IS_ERR(pmx) + return PTR_ERR(pmx); + pinmux_enable(pmx); + + /* This releases the pins again */ + pinmux_disable(pmx); + pinmux_put(pmx); + + /* Enable on position B */ + pmx = pinmux_get(&device, "spi0-pos-B"); + if IS_ERR(pmx) + return PTR_ERR(pmx); + pinmux_enable(pmx); + ... +} + +The above has to be done from process context. diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 1a8cc60..ce23d5f 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -5001,6 +5001,11 @@ L: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org S: Maintained F: drivers/mtd/devices/phram.c
+PINMUX SUBSYSTEM +M: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org +S: Maintained +F: drivers/pinmux/ + PKTCDVD DRIVER M: Peter Osterlund petero2@telia.com S: Maintained diff --git a/drivers/Kconfig b/drivers/Kconfig index 95b9e7e..40d3e16 100644 --- a/drivers/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/Kconfig @@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ source "drivers/pps/Kconfig"
source "drivers/ptp/Kconfig"
+# pinctrl before gpio - gpio drivers may need it + +source "drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig" + source "drivers/gpio/Kconfig"
source "drivers/w1/Kconfig" diff --git a/drivers/Makefile b/drivers/Makefile index 7fa433a..e7afb3a 100644 --- a/drivers/Makefile +++ b/drivers/Makefile @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ # Rewritten to use lists instead of if-statements. #
+# GPIO must come after pinctrl as gpios may need to mux pins etc +obj-y += pinctrl/ obj-y += gpio/ obj-$(CONFIG_PCI) += pci/ obj-$(CONFIG_PARISC) += parisc/ diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig new file mode 100644 index 0000000..adb0be0 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +# +# PINCTRL infrastructure and drivers +# + +menuconfig PINCTRL + bool "PINCTRL Support" + depends on SYSFS && EXPERIMENTAL + help + This enables the PINCTRL subsystem for controlling pins + on chip packages, for example multiplexing pins on primarily + PGA and BGA packages for systems on chip. + + If unsure, say N. + +if PINCTRL + +config PINMUX + bool "Support pinmux controllers" + help + Say Y here if you want the pincontrol subsystem to handle pin + multiplexing. + +config DEBUG_PINCTRL + bool "Debug PINCTRL calls" + depends on DEBUG_KERNEL + help + Say Y here to add some extra checks and diagnostics to PINCTRL calls. + +endif diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 0000000..596ce9f --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +# generic pinmux support + +ccflags-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_PINMUX) += -DDEBUG + +obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL) += core.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PINMUX) += pinmux.o diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7af7e65 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c @@ -0,0 +1,599 @@ +/* + * Core driver for the pin control subsystem + * + * Copyright (C) 2011 ST-Ericsson SA + * Written on behalf of Linaro for ST-Ericsson + * Based on bits of regulator core, gpio core and clk core + * + * Author: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org + * + * License terms: GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2 + */ +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "pinctrl core: " fmt + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/radix-tree.h> +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/list.h> +#include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/spinlock.h> +#include <linux/sysfs.h> +#include <linux/debugfs.h> +#include <linux/seq_file.h> +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h> +#include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h> +#include "core.h" +#include "pinmux.h" + +/* Global list of pin control devices */ +static DEFINE_MUTEX(pinctrldev_list_mutex); +static LIST_HEAD(pinctrldev_list); + +/* sysfs interaction */ +static ssize_t pinctrl_name_show(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) +{ + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + + return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", pctldev_get_name(pctldev)); +} + +static void pinctrl_dev_release(struct device *dev) +{ + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + kfree(pctldev); +} + +static DEVICE_ATTR(name, S_IRUGO, pinctrl_name_show, NULL); + +static struct attribute *pinctrl_dev_attrs[] = { + &dev_attr_name.attr, + NULL +}; + +static struct attribute_group pinctrl_dev_attr_group = { + .attrs = pinctrl_dev_attrs, +}; + +static const struct attribute_group *pinctrl_dev_attr_groups[] = { + &pinctrl_dev_attr_group, + NULL +}; + +static struct bus_type pinctrl_bus = { + .name = "pinctrl", +}; + +static struct device_type pinctrl_type = { + .groups = pinctrl_dev_attr_groups, + .release = pinctrl_dev_release, +}; + +/** + * Looks up a pin control device matching a certain pinmux map + */ +struct pinctrl_dev *get_pctrldev_for_pinmux_map(struct pinmux_map const *map) +{ + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev = NULL; + bool found = false; + + mutex_lock(&pinctrldev_list_mutex); + list_for_each_entry(pctldev, &pinctrldev_list, node) { + if (map->ctrl_dev && &pctldev->dev == map->ctrl_dev) { + /* Matched on device */ + found = true; + break; + } + + if (map->ctrl_dev_name && + !strcmp(dev_name(&pctldev->dev), map->ctrl_dev_name)) { + /* Matched on device name */ + found = true; + break; + } + } + mutex_unlock(&pinctrldev_list_mutex); + + if (found) + return pctldev; + + return NULL; +} + +struct pin_desc *pin_desc_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin) +{ + struct pin_desc *pindesc; + unsigned long flags; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&pctldev->pin_desc_tree_lock, flags); + pindesc = radix_tree_lookup(&pctldev->pin_desc_tree, pin); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctldev->pin_desc_tree_lock, flags); + + return pindesc; +} + +/** + * Tell us whether a certain pin exist on a certain pin controller + * or not. Pin lists may be sparse, so some pins may not exist. + * @pctldev: the pin control device to check the pin on + * @pin: pin to check, use the local pin controller index number + */ +bool pin_is_valid(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin) +{ + struct pin_desc *pindesc; + + if (pin < 0) + return false; + + pindesc = pin_desc_get(pctldev, pin); + if (pindesc == NULL) + return false; + + return true; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pin_is_valid); + +/* Deletes a range of pin descriptors */ +static void pinctrl_free_pindescs(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + const struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins, + unsigned num_pins) +{ + int i; + + spin_lock(&pctldev->pin_desc_tree_lock); + for (i = 0; i < num_pins; i++) { + struct pin_desc *pindesc; + + pindesc = radix_tree_lookup(&pctldev->pin_desc_tree, + pins[i].number); + if (pindesc != NULL) { + radix_tree_delete(&pctldev->pin_desc_tree, + pins[i].number); + } + kfree(pindesc); + } + spin_unlock(&pctldev->pin_desc_tree_lock); +} + +static int pinctrl_register_one_pin(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + unsigned number, const char *name) +{ + struct pin_desc *pindesc; + + pindesc = pin_desc_get(pctldev, number); + if (pindesc != NULL) { + pr_err("pin %d already registered on %s\n", number, + pctldev->desc->name); + return -EINVAL; + } + + pindesc = kzalloc(sizeof(*pindesc), GFP_KERNEL); + if (pindesc == NULL) + return -ENOMEM; + + /* Set owner */ + pindesc->pctldev = pctldev; + + /* Copy optional basic pin info */ + if (name) + strlcpy(pindesc->name, name, sizeof(pindesc->name)); + + spin_lock(&pctldev->pin_desc_tree_lock); + radix_tree_insert(&pctldev->pin_desc_tree, number, pindesc); + spin_unlock(&pctldev->pin_desc_tree_lock); + pr_debug("registered pin %d (%s) on %s\n", + number, name ? name : "(unnamed)", pctldev->desc->name); + return 0; +} + +static int pinctrl_register_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + struct pinctrl_pin_desc const *pins, + unsigned num_descs) +{ + unsigned i; + int ret = 0; + + for (i = 0; i < num_descs; i++) { + ret = pinctrl_register_one_pin(pctldev, + pins[i].number, pins[i].name); + if (ret) + return ret; + } + + return 0; +} + +/** + * pinctrl_match_gpio_range() - check if a certain GPIO pin is in the range of + * a certain pin controller, return the range or NULL + */ +static struct pinctrl_gpio_range * +pinctrl_match_gpio_range(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned gpio) +{ + struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range = NULL; + + /* Loop over the ranges */ + spin_lock(&pctldev->gpio_ranges_lock); + list_for_each_entry(range, &pctldev->gpio_ranges, node) { + /* Check if we're in the valid range */ + if (gpio >= range->base && + gpio < range->base + range->npins) { + spin_unlock(&pctldev->gpio_ranges_lock); + return range; + } + } + spin_unlock(&pctldev->gpio_ranges_lock); + + return NULL; +} + +/** + * pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range() - find the pin controller handling a certain + * pin from the pinspace in the GPIO subsystem, return the device and the + * matching GPIO range. Returns negative if the GPIO range could not be found + * in any device + * @gpio: the pin to locate the pin controller for + * @outdev: the pin control device if found + * @outrange: the GPIO range if found + */ +int pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range(unsigned gpio, + struct pinctrl_dev **outdev, + struct pinctrl_gpio_range **outrange) +{ + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev = NULL; + + /* Loop over the pin controllers */ + mutex_lock(&pinctrldev_list_mutex); + list_for_each_entry(pctldev, &pinctrldev_list, node) { + struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range; + + range = pinctrl_match_gpio_range(pctldev, gpio); + if (range != NULL) { + *outdev = pctldev; + *outrange = range; + return 0; + } + } + mutex_unlock(&pinctrldev_list_mutex); + + return -EINVAL; +} + +/** + * pinctrl_add_gpio_range() - this adds a range of GPIOs to be handled + * by a certain pin controller. Call this to register handled ranges after + * registering your pin controller. + * @pctldev: pin controller device to add the range to + * @range: the GPIO range to add + */ +void pinctrl_add_gpio_range(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range) +{ + spin_lock(&pctldev->gpio_ranges_lock); + list_add(&range->node, &pctldev->gpio_ranges); + spin_unlock(&pctldev->gpio_ranges_lock); +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS + +static int pinctrl_pins_show(struct seq_file *s, void *what) +{ + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev = s->private; + const struct pinctrl_ops *ops = pctldev->desc->pctlops; + unsigned pin; + + seq_printf(s, "registered pins: %d\n", pctldev->desc->npins); + seq_printf(s, "max pin number: %d\n", pctldev->desc->maxpin); + + /* The highest pin number need to be included in the loop, thus <= */ + for (pin = 0; pin <= pctldev->desc->maxpin; pin++) { + struct pin_desc *desc; + + desc = pin_desc_get(pctldev, pin); + /* Pin space may be sparse */ + if (desc == NULL) + continue; + + seq_printf(s, "pin %d (%s) ", pin, + desc->name ? desc->name : "unnamed"); + + /* Driver-specific info per pin */ + if (ops->pin_dbg_show) + ops->pin_dbg_show(pctldev, s, pin); + + seq_puts(s, "\n"); + } + + return 0; +} + +static int pinctrl_groups_show(struct seq_file *s, void *what) +{ + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev = s->private; + const struct pinctrl_ops *ops = pctldev->desc->pctlops; + unsigned selector = 0; + + /* No grouping */ + if (!ops) + return 0; + + seq_puts(s, "registered pin groups:\n"); + while (ops->list_groups(pctldev, selector) >= 0) { + unsigned *pins; + unsigned num_pins; + const char *gname = ops->get_group_name(pctldev, selector); + int ret; + int i; + + ret = ops->get_group_pins(pctldev, selector, + &pins, &num_pins); + if (ret) + seq_printf(s, "%s [ERROR GETTING PINS]\n", + gname); + else { + seq_printf(s, "group: %s, pins = [ ", gname); + for (i = 0; i < num_pins; i++) + seq_printf(s, "%d ", pins[i]); + seq_puts(s, "]\n"); + } + selector++; + } + + + return 0; +} + +static int pinctrl_gpioranges_show(struct seq_file *s, void *what) +{ + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev = s->private; + struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range = NULL; + + seq_puts(s, "GPIO ranges handled:\n"); + + /* Loop over the ranges */ + spin_lock(&pctldev->gpio_ranges_lock); + list_for_each_entry(range, &pctldev->gpio_ranges, node) { + seq_printf(s, "%u: %s [%u - %u]\n", range->id, range->name, + range->base, (range->base + range->npins - 1)); + } + spin_unlock(&pctldev->gpio_ranges_lock); + + return 0; +} + +static int pinctrl_devices_show(struct seq_file *s, void *what) +{ + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev; + + seq_puts(s, "name [pinmux]\n"); + mutex_lock(&pinctrldev_list_mutex); + list_for_each_entry(pctldev, &pinctrldev_list, node) { + seq_printf(s, "%s ", pctldev->desc->name); + if (pctldev->desc->pmxops) + seq_puts(s, "yes"); + else + seq_puts(s, "no"); + seq_puts(s, "\n"); + } + mutex_unlock(&pinctrldev_list_mutex); + + return 0; +} + +static int pinctrl_pins_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + return single_open(file, pinctrl_pins_show, inode->i_private); +} + +static int pinctrl_groups_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + return single_open(file, pinctrl_groups_show, inode->i_private); +} + +static int pinctrl_gpioranges_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + return single_open(file, pinctrl_gpioranges_show, inode->i_private); +} + +static int pinctrl_devices_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + return single_open(file, pinctrl_devices_show, NULL); +} + +static const struct file_operations pinctrl_pins_ops = { + .open = pinctrl_pins_open, + .read = seq_read, + .llseek = seq_lseek, + .release = single_release, +}; + +static const struct file_operations pinctrl_groups_ops = { + .open = pinctrl_groups_open, + .read = seq_read, + .llseek = seq_lseek, + .release = single_release, +}; + +static const struct file_operations pinctrl_gpioranges_ops = { + .open = pinctrl_gpioranges_open, + .read = seq_read, + .llseek = seq_lseek, + .release = single_release, +}; + +static const struct file_operations pinctrl_devices_ops = { + .open = pinctrl_devices_open, + .read = seq_read, + .llseek = seq_lseek, + .release = single_release, +}; + +static struct dentry *debugfs_root; + +static void pinctrl_init_device_debugfs(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev) +{ + static struct dentry *device_root; + + device_root = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(&pctldev->dev), + debugfs_root); + if (IS_ERR(device_root) || !device_root) { + pr_warn("failed to create debugfs directory for %s\n", + dev_name(&pctldev->dev)); + return; + } + debugfs_create_file("pins", S_IFREG | S_IRUGO, + device_root, pctldev, &pinctrl_pins_ops); + debugfs_create_file("pingroups", S_IFREG | S_IRUGO, + device_root, pctldev, &pinctrl_groups_ops); + debugfs_create_file("gpio-ranges", S_IFREG | S_IRUGO, + device_root, pctldev, &pinctrl_gpioranges_ops); + pinmux_init_device_debugfs(device_root, pctldev); +} + +static void pinctrl_init_debugfs(void) +{ + debugfs_root = debugfs_create_dir("pinctrl", NULL); + if (IS_ERR(debugfs_root) || !debugfs_root) { + pr_warn("failed to create debugfs directory\n"); + debugfs_root = NULL; + return; + } + + debugfs_create_file("pinctrl-devices", S_IFREG | S_IRUGO, + debugfs_root, NULL, &pinctrl_devices_ops); + pinmux_init_debugfs(debugfs_root); +} + +#else /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */ + +static void pinctrl_init_device_debugfs(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev) +{ +} + +static void pinctrl_init_debugfs(void) +{ +} + +#endif + +/** + * pinctrl_register() - register a pin controller device + * @pctldesc: descriptor for this pin controller + * @dev: parent device for this pin controller + * @driver_data: private pin controller data for this pin controller + */ +struct pinctrl_dev *pinctrl_register(struct pinctrl_desc *pctldesc, + struct device *dev, void *driver_data) +{ + static atomic_t pinmux_no = ATOMIC_INIT(0); + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev; + int ret; + + if (pctldesc == NULL) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + if (pctldesc->name == NULL) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + /* If we're implementing pinmuxing, check the ops for sanity */ + if (pctldesc->pmxops) { + ret = pinmux_check_ops(pctldesc->pmxops); + if (ret) { + pr_err("%s pinmux ops lacks necessary functions\n", + pctldesc->name); + return ERR_PTR(ret); + } + } + + pctldev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pinctrl_dev), GFP_KERNEL); + if (pctldev == NULL) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + /* Initialize pin control device struct */ + pctldev->owner = pctldesc->owner; + pctldev->desc = pctldesc; + pctldev->driver_data = driver_data; + INIT_RADIX_TREE(&pctldev->pin_desc_tree, GFP_KERNEL); + spin_lock_init(&pctldev->pin_desc_tree_lock); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pctldev->gpio_ranges); + spin_lock_init(&pctldev->gpio_ranges_lock); + + /* Register device with sysfs */ + pctldev->dev.parent = dev; + pctldev->dev.bus = &pinctrl_bus; + pctldev->dev.type = &pinctrl_type; + dev_set_name(&pctldev->dev, "pinctrl.%d", + atomic_inc_return(&pinmux_no) - 1); + ret = device_register(&pctldev->dev); + if (ret != 0) { + pr_err("error in device registration\n"); + put_device(&pctldev->dev); + kfree(pctldev); + goto out_err; + } + dev_set_drvdata(&pctldev->dev, pctldev); + + /* Register all the pins */ + pr_debug("try to register %d pins on %s...\n", + pctldesc->npins, pctldesc->name); + ret = pinctrl_register_pins(pctldev, pctldesc->pins, pctldesc->npins); + if (ret) { + pr_err("error during pin registration\n"); + pinctrl_free_pindescs(pctldev, pctldesc->pins, + pctldesc->npins); + goto out_err; + } + + pinctrl_init_device_debugfs(pctldev); + mutex_lock(&pinctrldev_list_mutex); + list_add(&pctldev->node, &pinctrldev_list); + mutex_unlock(&pinctrldev_list_mutex); + return pctldev; + +out_err: + put_device(&pctldev->dev); + kfree(pctldev); + return ERR_PTR(ret); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_register); + +/** + * pinctrl_unregister() - unregister pinmux + * @pctldev: pin controller to unregister + * + * Called by pinmux drivers to unregister a pinmux. + */ +void pinctrl_unregister(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev) +{ + if (pctldev == NULL) + return; + + mutex_lock(&pinctrldev_list_mutex); + list_del(&pctldev->node); + device_unregister(&pctldev->dev); + mutex_unlock(&pinctrldev_list_mutex); + /* Destroy descriptor tree */ + pinctrl_free_pindescs(pctldev, pctldev->desc->pins, + pctldev->desc->npins); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_unregister); + +static int __init pinctrl_init(void) +{ + int ret; + + ret = bus_register(&pinctrl_bus); + if (ret) { + pr_crit("could not register pinctrl bus\n"); + return ret; + } + + pr_info("initialized pinctrl subsystem\n"); + pinctrl_init_debugfs(); + return 0; +} + +/* init early since many drivers really need to initialized pinmux early */ +core_initcall(pinctrl_init); diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.h b/drivers/pinctrl/core.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..283007c --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.h @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +/** + * struct pin_desc - pin descriptor for each physical pin in the arch + * @pctldev: corresponding pin control device + * @name: a name for the pin, e.g. the name of the pin/pad/finger on a + * datasheet or such + * @mux_requested: whether the pin is already requested by pinmux or not + * @mux_function: a named muxing function for the pin that will be passed to + * subdrivers and shown in debugfs etc + */ +struct pin_desc { + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev; + char name[16]; + /* These fields only added when supporting pinmux drivers */ +#ifdef CONFIG_PINMUX + bool mux_requested; + char mux_function[16]; +#endif +}; + +struct pin_desc *pin_desc_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin); +struct pinctrl_dev *get_pctrldev_for_pinmux_map(struct pinmux_map const *map); +int pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range(unsigned gpio, + struct pinctrl_dev **outdev, + struct pinctrl_gpio_range **outrange); diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dcd90a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c @@ -0,0 +1,822 @@ +/* + * Core driver for the pin muxing portions of the pin control subsystem + * + * Copyright (C) 2011 ST-Ericsson SA + * Written on behalf of Linaro for ST-Ericsson + * Based on bits of regulator core, gpio core and clk core + * + * Author: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org + * + * License terms: GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2 + */ +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "pinmux core: " fmt + +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/radix-tree.h> +#include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/list.h> +#include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/spinlock.h> +#include <linux/sysfs.h> +#include <linux/debugfs.h> +#include <linux/seq_file.h> +#include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h> +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h> +#include "core.h" + +/* Global list of pinmuxes */ +static DEFINE_MUTEX(pinmux_list_mutex); +static LIST_HEAD(pinmux_list); + +/** + * struct pinmux - per-device pinmux state holder + * @node: global list node - only for internal use + * @dev: the device using this pinmux + * @map: corresponding pinmux map active for this pinmux setting + * @usecount: the number of active users of this mux setting, used to keep + * track of nested use cases + * @pins: an array of discrete physical pins used in this mapping, taken + * from the global pin enumeration space (copied from pinmux map) + * @num_pins: the number of pins in this mapping array, i.e. the number of + * elements in .pins so we can iterate over that array (copied from + * pinmux map) + * @pctldev: pin control device handling this pinmux + * @func_selector: the function selector for the pinmux device handling + * this pinmux + * @group_selector: the group selector for the pinmux device and + * selector combination handling this pinmux + * @mutex: a lock for the pinmux state holder + */ +struct pinmux { + struct list_head node; + struct device *dev; + struct pinmux_map const *map; + unsigned usecount; + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev; + unsigned func_selector; + unsigned group_selector; + struct mutex mutex; +}; + +/** + * pin_request() - request a single pin to be muxed in, typically for GPIO + * @pin: the pin number in the global pin space + * @function: a functional name to give to this pin, passed to the driver + * so it knows what function to mux in, e.g. the string "gpioNN" + * means that you want to mux in the pin for use as GPIO number NN + * @gpio: if this request concerns a single GPIO pin + * @gpio_range: the range matching the GPIO pin if this is a request for a + * single GPIO pin + */ +static int pin_request(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + int pin, const char *function, bool gpio, + struct pinctrl_gpio_range *gpio_range) +{ + struct pin_desc *desc; + const struct pinmux_ops *ops; + int status = -EINVAL; + + pr_debug("request pin %d for %s\n", pin, function); + + if (!pin_is_valid(pctldev, pin)) { + pr_err("pin is invalid\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (!function) { + pr_err("no function name given\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + desc = pin_desc_get(pctldev, pin); + if (desc == NULL) { + pr_err("pin is not registered so it cannot be requested\n"); + goto out; + } + if (desc->mux_requested) { + pr_err("pin already requested\n"); + goto out; + } + ops = pctldev->desc->pmxops; + + /* Let each pin increase references to this module */ + if (!try_module_get(pctldev->owner)) { + pr_err("could not increase module refcount for pin %d\n", pin); + status = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + /* + * If there is no kind of request function for the pin we just assume + * we got it by default and proceed. + */ + if (gpio && ops->gpio_request_enable) + /* This requests and enables a single GPIO pin */ + status = ops->gpio_request_enable(pctldev, gpio_range, pin); + else if (ops->request) + status = ops->request(pctldev, pin); + else + status = 0; + + if (status) { + pr_err("->request on device %s failed " + "for pin %d\n", + pctldev->desc->name, pin); + goto out; + } + + desc->mux_requested = true; + strncpy(desc->mux_function, function, sizeof(desc->mux_function)); + +out: + if (status) + pr_err("pin-%d (%s) status %d\n", + pin, function ? : "?", status); + + return status; +} + +/** + * pin_free() - release a single muxed in pin so something else can be muxed in + * instead + * @pin: the pin to free + */ +static void pin_free(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin) +{ + const struct pinmux_ops *ops = pctldev->desc->pmxops; + struct pin_desc *desc; + + desc = pin_desc_get(pctldev, pin); + if (desc == NULL) { + pr_err("pin is not registered so it cannot be freed\n"); + return; + } + + if (ops->free) + ops->free(pctldev, pin); + + desc->mux_requested = false; + desc->mux_function[0] = '\0'; + module_put(pctldev->owner); +} + +/** + * pinmux_request_gpio() - request a single pin to be muxed in to be used + * as a GPIO pin + * @gpio: the GPIO pin number from the GPIO subsystem number space + */ +int pinmux_request_gpio(unsigned gpio) +{ + char gpiostr[16]; + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev; + struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range; + int ret; + int pin; + + ret = pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range(gpio, &pctldev, &range); + if (ret) + return -EINVAL; + + /* Convert to the pin controllers number space */ + pin = gpio - range->base; + + /* Conjure some name stating what chip and pin this is taken by */ + snprintf(gpiostr, 15, "%s:%d", range->name, gpio); + + return pin_request(pctldev, pin, gpiostr, true, range); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinmux_request_gpio); + +/** + * pinmux_free_gpio() - free a single pin, currently muxed in to be used + * as a GPIO pin + * @gpio: the GPIO pin number from the GPIO subsystem number space + */ +void pinmux_free_gpio(unsigned gpio) +{ + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev; + struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range; + int ret; + int pin; + + ret = pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range(gpio, &pctldev, &range); + if (ret) + return; + + /* Convert to the pin controllers number space */ + pin = gpio - range->base; + + pin_free(pctldev, pin); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinmux_free_gpio); + +int pinmux_register_mappings(struct pinmux_map const *maps, unsigned num_maps) +{ + int ret = 0; + int i; + + pr_debug("add %d pinmux maps\n", num_maps); + for (i = 0; i < num_maps; i++) { + struct pinmux *pmx; + + /* Sanity check the mapping */ + if (!maps[i].function) { + pr_err("failed to register map %d - no function ID given\n", i); + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + if (!maps[i].dev && !maps[i].dev_name) + pr_debug("add anonymous function %s with no device\n", + maps[i].function); + + /* + * create the state cookie holder struct pinmux for each + * mapping, this is what consumers will get when requesting + * a pinmux handle with pinmux_get() + */ + pmx = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pinmux), GFP_KERNEL); + if (pmx == NULL) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto out; + } + mutex_init(&pmx->mutex); + pmx->map = &maps[i]; + + /* Add the pinmux */ + mutex_lock(&pinmux_list_mutex); + list_add(&pmx->node, &pinmux_list); + mutex_unlock(&pinmux_list_mutex); + pr_debug("add function %s\n", maps[i].function); + } + +out: + return ret; +} + +/** + * acquire_pins() - acquire all the pins for a certain funcion on a certain + * pinmux device + * @pctldev: the device to take the pins on + * @func_selector: the function selector to acquire the pins for + * @group_selector: the group selector containing the pins to acquire + */ +static int acquire_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + unsigned func_selector, + unsigned group_selector) +{ + const struct pinctrl_ops *pctlops = pctldev->desc->pctlops; + const struct pinmux_ops *pmxops = pctldev->desc->pmxops; + const char *func = pmxops->get_function_name(pctldev, + func_selector); + unsigned *pins; + unsigned num_pins; + int ret; + int i; + + ret = pctlops->get_group_pins(pctldev, group_selector, + &pins, &num_pins); + if (ret) + return ret; + + /* Try to allocate all pins in this pinmux map, one by one */ + for (i = 0; i < num_pins; i++) { + ret = pin_request(pctldev, pins[i], func, false, NULL); + if (ret) { + pr_err("could not get pin %d for function %s " + "on device %s - conflicting mux mappings?\n", + pins[i], func ? : "(undefined)", + pctldev_get_name(pctldev)); + /* On error release all taken pins */ + i--; /* this pin just failed */ + for (; i >= 0; i--) + pin_free(pctldev, pins[i]); + return -ENODEV; + } + } + return 0; +} + +/** + * release_pins() - release pins taken by earlier acquirement + * @pctldev: the device to free the pinx on + * @group_selector: the group selector containing the pins to free + */ +static void release_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + unsigned group_selector) +{ + const struct pinctrl_ops *pctlops = pctldev->desc->pctlops; + unsigned *pins; + unsigned num_pins; + int ret; + int i; + + ret = pctlops->get_group_pins(pctldev, group_selector, + &pins, &num_pins); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&pctldev->dev, "could not get pins to release for " + "group selector %d\n", + group_selector); + return; + } + for (i = 0; i < num_pins; i++) + pin_free(pctldev, pins[i]); +} + +/** + * pinmux_check_pin_group() - check that the pinmux driver can supply the + * selected pin group for a certain function, returns the group selector if + * the group and function selector will work fine together, else returns + * negative + * @pctldev: device to check the pin group vs function for + * @func_selector: the function selector to check the pin group for, we have + * already looked this up in the calling function + * @pin_group: the pin group to match to the function + */ +static int pinmux_check_pin_group(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + unsigned func_selector, + const char *pin_group) +{ + const struct pinmux_ops *pmxops = pctldev->desc->pmxops; + const struct pinctrl_ops *pctlops = pctldev->desc->pctlops; + unsigned group_selector = 0; + + /* + * If the driver does not support different pin groups for the + * functions, we only support group 0, and assume this exists. + */ + if (!pctlops || !pctlops->list_groups) { + return 0; + } + + /* + * Passing NULL (no specific group) will select the first and + * hopefully only group of pins available for this function. + */ + if (!pin_group) { + unsigned *groups; + unsigned num_groups; + int ret; + + ret = pmxops->get_function_groups(pctldev, func_selector, + &groups, &num_groups); + if (ret) + return ret; + if (num_groups < 1) + return -EINVAL; + + group_selector = groups[0]; + + if (num_groups > 1) + pr_debug("function %s support more than one group, " + "default-selecting first group %d\n", + pmxops->get_function_name(pctldev, func_selector), + group_selector); + + return group_selector; + } + + pr_debug("check if we have pin group %s on controller %s\n", + pin_group, pctldev_get_name(pctldev)); + + while (pctlops->list_groups(pctldev, group_selector) >= 0) { + const char *gname = pctlops->get_group_name(pctldev, + group_selector); + + /* OK we support it... */ + if (!strcmp(gname, pin_group)) + return group_selector; + + group_selector++; + } + + pr_err("%s does not support pin group %s with function %s\n", + pctldev_get_name(pctldev), + pin_group, + pmxops->get_function_name(pctldev, func_selector)); + return -EINVAL; +} + +/** + * pinmux_search_function() - search the pinmux driver for an applicable + * function with a specific pin group, returns 0 if these can be mapped + * negative otherwise + * @pctldev: device to check for function and position + * @map: function map containing the function and position to look for + * @func_selector: returns the applicable function selector if found + * @group_selector: returns the applicable group selector if found + */ +static int pinmux_search_function(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + struct pinmux_map const *map, + unsigned *func_selector, + unsigned *group_selector) +{ + const struct pinmux_ops *ops = pctldev->desc->pmxops; + unsigned selector = 0; + + /* See if this pctldev has this function */ + while (ops->list_functions(pctldev, selector) >= 0) { + const char *fname = ops->get_function_name(pctldev, + selector); + int ret; + + if (!strcmp(map->function, fname)) { + /* Found the function, check pin group */ + ret = pinmux_check_pin_group(pctldev, selector, + map->group); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + /* This function and group selector can be used */ + *func_selector = selector; + *group_selector = ret; + return 0; + + } + selector++; + } + + pr_err("%s does not support function %s\n", + pctldev_get_name(pctldev), map->function); + return -EINVAL; +} + + +/** + * pinmux_get() - retrieves the pinmux for a certain device + * @dev: the device to get the pinmux for + * @name: an optional specific mux mapping name or NULL, the name is only + * needed if you want to have more than one mapping per device, or if you + * need an anonymous pinmux (not tied to any specific device) + */ +struct pinmux *pinmux_get(struct device *dev, const char *name) +{ + + struct pinmux_map const *map = NULL; + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev = NULL; + const char *devname = NULL; + struct pinmux *pmx; + bool found_map = false; + unsigned func_selector; + unsigned group_selector; + int ret = -ENODEV; + + /* We must have dev or ID or both */ + if (!dev && !name) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + mutex_lock(&pinmux_list_mutex); + + if (dev) + devname = dev_name(dev); + + pr_debug("get mux %s for device %s\n", name, + devname ? devname : "(none)"); + + /* Iterate over the pinmux maps to locate the right one */ + list_for_each_entry(pmx, &pinmux_list, node) { + map = pmx->map; + + /* + * First, try to find the pctldev given in the map + */ + pctldev = get_pctrldev_for_pinmux_map(map); + if (!pctldev) { + const char *devname = NULL; + + if (map->ctrl_dev) + devname = dev_name(map->ctrl_dev); + else if (map->ctrl_dev_name) + devname = map->ctrl_dev_name; + + pr_warning("could not find a pinctrl device for pinmux " + "function %s, fishy, they shall all have one\n", + map->function); + pr_warning("given pinctrl device name: %s", + devname ? devname : "UNDEFINED"); + + /* Continue to check the other mappings anyway... */ + continue; + } + + pr_debug("found pctldev %s to handle function %s", + dev_name(&pctldev->dev), map->function); + + + /* + * If we're looking for a specific named map, this must match, + * else we loop and look for the next. + */ + if (name != NULL) { + if (map->name == NULL) + continue; + if (strcmp(map->name, name)) + continue; + } + + /* + * This is for the case where no device name is given, we + * already know that the function name matches from above + * code. + */ + if (!map->dev_name && (name != NULL)) { + found_map = true; + break; + } + + /* If the mapping has a device set up it must match */ + if (map->dev_name && + (!devname || !strcmp(map->dev_name, devname))) { + /* MATCH! */ + found_map = true; + break; + } + } + + mutex_unlock(&pinmux_list_mutex); + + if (!found_map) { + pr_err("could not find mux map for device %s, ID %s\n", + devname ? devname : "(anonymous)", + name ? name : "(undefined)"); + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + } + + /* Make sure that noone else is using this pinmux */ + mutex_lock(&pmx->mutex); + if (pmx->dev) { + if (pmx->dev != dev) { + mutex_unlock(&pmx->mutex); + pr_err("mapping already in use device %s, ID %s\n", + devname ? devname : "(anonymous)", + name ? name : "(undefined)"); + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + } else { + /* We already fetched this and requested pins */ + mutex_unlock(&pmx->mutex); + return pmx; + } + } + mutex_unlock(&pmx->mutex); + + /* Now go into the driver and try to match a function and group */ + ret = pinmux_search_function(pctldev, map, &func_selector, + &group_selector); + if (ret < 0) + return ERR_PTR(ret); + + ret = acquire_pins(pctldev, func_selector, group_selector); + if (ret) + return ERR_PTR(ret); + + /* Success! */ + mutex_lock(&pmx->mutex); + pmx->dev = dev; + pmx->pctldev = pctldev; + pmx->func_selector = func_selector; + pmx->group_selector = group_selector; + mutex_unlock(&pmx->mutex); + return pmx; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinmux_get); + +/** + * pinmux_put() - release a previously claimed pinmux + * @pmx: a pinmux previously claimed by pinmux_get() + */ +void pinmux_put(struct pinmux *pmx) +{ + if (pmx == NULL) + return; + mutex_lock(&pmx->mutex); + if (pmx->usecount) + pr_warn("releasing pinmux with active users!\n"); + /* Release all pins taken on pinmux_get() */ + release_pins(pmx->pctldev, pmx->group_selector); + pmx->dev = NULL; + pmx->pctldev = NULL; + pmx->func_selector = 0; + pmx->group_selector = 0; + mutex_unlock(&pmx->mutex); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinmux_put); + +/** + * pinmux_enable() - enable a certain pinmux setting + * @pmx: the pinmux to enable, previously claimed by pinmux_get() + */ +int pinmux_enable(struct pinmux *pmx) +{ + int ret = 0; + + if (pmx == NULL) + return -EINVAL; + mutex_lock(&pmx->mutex); + if (pmx->usecount++ == 0) { + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev = pmx->pctldev; + const struct pinmux_ops *ops = pctldev->desc->pmxops; + + ret = ops->enable(pctldev, pmx->func_selector, + pmx->group_selector); + if (ret) + pmx->usecount--; + } + mutex_unlock(&pmx->mutex); + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinmux_enable); + +/** + * pinmux_disable() - disable a certain pinmux setting + * @pmx: the pinmux to disable, previously claimed by pinmux_get() + */ +void pinmux_disable(struct pinmux *pmx) +{ + if (pmx == NULL) + return; + + mutex_lock(&pmx->mutex); + if (--pmx->usecount == 0) { + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev = pmx->pctldev; + const struct pinmux_ops *ops = pctldev->desc->pmxops; + + ops->disable(pctldev, pmx->func_selector, + pmx->group_selector); + } + mutex_unlock(&pmx->mutex); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinmux_disable); + +int pinmux_check_ops(const struct pinmux_ops *ops) +{ + /* Check that we implement required operations */ + if (!ops->list_functions || + !ops->get_function_name || + !ops->get_function_groups || + !ops->enable || + !ops->disable) + return -EINVAL; + + return 0; +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS + +/* Called from pincontrol core */ +static int pinmux_functions_show(struct seq_file *s, void *what) +{ + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev = s->private; + const struct pinmux_ops *pmxops = pctldev->desc->pmxops; + const struct pinctrl_ops *pctlops = pctldev->desc->pctlops; + unsigned func_selector = 0; + + while (pmxops->list_functions(pctldev, func_selector) >= 0) { + const char *func = pmxops->get_function_name(pctldev, + func_selector); + unsigned *groups; + unsigned num_groups; + int ret; + int i; + + ret = pmxops->get_function_groups(pctldev, func_selector, + &groups, &num_groups); + if (ret) + seq_printf(s, "function %s: COULD NOT GET GROUPS\n", + func); + + seq_printf(s, "function: %s, groups = [ ", func); + for (i = 0; i < num_groups; i++) + seq_printf(s, "%s ", + pctlops->get_group_name(pctldev, groups[i])); + seq_puts(s, "]\n"); + + func_selector++; + + } + + return 0; +} + +static int pinmux_show(struct seq_file *s, void *what) +{ + struct pinmux *pmx; + + seq_puts(s, "System pinmuxes and their maps:\n"); + list_for_each_entry(pmx, &pinmux_list, node) { + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev = pmx->pctldev; + const struct pinmux_ops *pmxops; + const struct pinctrl_ops *pctlops; + + if (!pctldev) { + seq_puts(s, "NO PIN CONTROLLER DEVICE\n"); + continue; + } + + pmxops = pctldev->desc->pmxops; + pctlops = pctldev->desc->pctlops; + + seq_printf(s, "device: %s function: %s (%u), " + "group: %s (%u) users: %u map-> %s\n", + pctldev_get_name(pmx->pctldev), + pmxops->get_function_name(pctldev, pmx->func_selector), + pmx->func_selector, + pctlops->get_group_name(pctldev, pmx->group_selector), + pmx->group_selector, + pmx->usecount, + pmx->dev ? dev_name(pmx->dev) : "(no device)"); + } + + return 0; +} + +static int pinmux_pins_show(struct seq_file *s, void *what) +{ + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev = s->private; + unsigned pin; + + if (pctldev == NULL) { + seq_puts(s, "device is gone\n"); + return 0; + } + + if (pctldev->desc == NULL) { + seq_puts(s, "device is lacking descriptor\n"); + return 0; + } + + seq_puts(s, "Pinmux settings per pin\n"); + seq_puts(s, "Format: pin (name): pinmuxfunction\n"); + + /* The highest pin number need to be included in the loop, thus <= */ + for (pin = 0; pin <= pctldev->desc->maxpin; pin++) { + + struct pin_desc *desc; + + desc = pin_desc_get(pctldev, pin); + /* Pin space may be sparse */ + if (desc == NULL) + continue; + + seq_printf(s, "pin %d (%s): %s\n", pin, + desc->name ? desc->name : "unnamed", + desc->mux_requested ? desc->mux_function : "UNCLAIMED"); + } + + return 0; +} + +static int pinmux_functions_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + return single_open(file, pinmux_functions_show, inode->i_private); +} + +static int pinmux_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + return single_open(file, pinmux_show, NULL); +} + +static int pinmux_pins_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + return single_open(file, pinmux_pins_show, inode->i_private); +} + +static const struct file_operations pinmux_functions_ops = { + .open = pinmux_functions_open, + .read = seq_read, + .llseek = seq_lseek, + .release = single_release, +}; + +static const struct file_operations pinmux_ops = { + .open = pinmux_open, + .read = seq_read, + .llseek = seq_lseek, + .release = single_release, +}; + +static const struct file_operations pinmux_pins_ops = { + .open = pinmux_pins_open, + .read = seq_read, + .llseek = seq_lseek, + .release = single_release, +}; + +void pinmux_init_device_debugfs(struct dentry *devroot, + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev) +{ + debugfs_create_file("pinmux-functions", S_IFREG | S_IRUGO, + devroot, pctldev, &pinmux_functions_ops); + debugfs_create_file("pinmux-pins", S_IFREG | S_IRUGO, + devroot, pctldev, &pinmux_pins_ops); +} + +void pinmux_init_debugfs(struct dentry *subsys_root) +{ + debugfs_create_file("pinmuxes", S_IFREG | S_IRUGO, + subsys_root, NULL, &pinmux_ops); +} + +#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */ diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ab672ef --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.h @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +int pinmux_check_ops(const struct pinmux_ops *ops); +void pinmux_init_device_debugfs(struct dentry *devroot, + struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev); +void pinmux_init_debugfs(struct dentry *subsys_root); diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/machine.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/machine.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..772d4e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/linux/pinctrl/machine.h @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +/* + * Machine interface for the pinctrl subsystem. + * + * Copyright (C) 2011 ST-Ericsson SA + * Written on behalf of Linaro for ST-Ericsson + * Based on bits of regulator core, gpio core and clk core + * + * Author: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org + * + * License terms: GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2 + */ +#ifndef __LINUX_PINMUX_MACHINE_H +#define __LINUX_PINMUX_MACHINE_H + +/** + * struct pinmux_map - boards/machines shall provide this map for devices + * @name: the name of this specific map entry for the particular machine. + * This is the second parameter passed to pinmux_get() when you want + * to have several mappings to the same device + * @ctrl_dev: the pin control device to be used by this mapping, may be NULL + * if you provide .ctrl_dev_name instead (this is more common) + * @ctrl_dev_name: the name of the device controlling this specific mapping, + * the name must be the same as in your struct device* + * @function: a function in the driver to use for this mapping, the driver + * will lookup the function referenced by this ID on the specified + * pin control device + * @group: sometimes a function can map to different pin groups, so this + * selects a certain specific pin group to activate for the function, if + * left as NULL, the first applicable group will be used + * @dev: the device using this specific mapping, may be NULL if you provide + * .dev_name instead (this is more common) + * @dev_name: the name of the device using this specific mapping, the name + * must be the same as in your struct device* + */ +struct pinmux_map { + const char *name; + struct device *ctrl_dev; + const char *ctrl_dev_name; + const char *function; + const char *group; + struct device *dev; + const char *dev_name; +}; + +/* + * Convenience macro to set a simple map from a certain pin controller and a + * certain function to a named device + */ +#define PINMUX_MAP(a, b, c) \ + { .ctrl_dev_name = a, .function = b, .dev_name = c } +/* + * Convenience macro to map a function onto the primary device pinctrl device + * this is especially helpful on systems that have only one pin controller + * or need to set up a lot of mappings on the primary controller. + */ +#define PINMUX_MAP_PRIMARY(a, b) \ + { .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl.0", .function = a, .dev_name = b } + +#ifdef CONFIG_PINMUX + +extern int pinmux_register_mappings(struct pinmux_map const *map, + unsigned num_maps); + +#else + +static inline int pinmux_register_mappings(struct pinmux_map const *map, + unsigned num_maps) +{ + return 0; +} + +#endif /* !CONFIG_PINCTRL */ +#endif diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1b23783 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@ +/* + * Interface the pinctrl subsystem + * + * Copyright (C) 2011 ST-Ericsson SA + * Written on behalf of Linaro for ST-Ericsson + * This interface is used in the core to keep track of pins. + * + * Author: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org + * + * License terms: GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2 + */ +#ifndef __LINUX_PINCTRL_PINCTRL_H +#define __LINUX_PINCTRL_PINCTRL_H + +#ifdef CONFIG_PINCTRL + +#include <linux/radix-tree.h> +#include <linux/spinlock.h> +#include <linux/list.h> +#include <linux/seq_file.h> + +struct pinctrl_dev; +struct pinmux_ops; +struct gpio_chip; + +/** + * struct pinctrl_pin_desc - boards/machines provide information on their + * pins, pads or other muxable units in this struct + * @number: unique pin number from the global pin number space + * @name: a name for this pin + */ +struct pinctrl_pin_desc { + unsigned number; + const char *name; +}; + +/* Convenience macro to define a single named or anonymous pin descriptor */ +#define PINCTRL_PIN(a, b) { .number = a, .name = b } +#define PINCTRL_PIN_ANON(a) { .number = a } + +/** + * struct pinctrl_gpio_range - each pin controller can provide subranges of + * the GPIO number space to be handled by the controller + * @name: a name for the chip in this range + * @id: an ID number for the chip in this range + * @base: base offset of the GPIO range + * @npins: number of pins in the GPIO range, including the base number + * @gc: an optional pointer to a gpio_chip + * @node: list node for internal use + */ +struct pinctrl_gpio_range { + const char name[16]; + unsigned int id; + unsigned int base; + unsigned int npins; + struct gpio_chip *gc; + struct list_head node; +}; + +/** + * struct pinctrl_ops - global pin control operations, to be implemented by + * pin controller drivers. + * @list_groups: list the number of selectable named groups available + * in this pinmux driver, the core will begin on 0 and call this + * repeatedly as long as it returns >= 0 to enumerate the groups + * @get_group_name: return the group name of the pin group + * @get_group_pins: return an array of pins corresponding to a certain + * group selector @pins, and the size of the array in @num_pins + * @pin_dbg_show: optional debugfs display hook that will provide per-device + * info for a certain pin in debugfs + */ +struct pinctrl_ops { + int (*list_groups) (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector); + const char *(*get_group_name) (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + unsigned selector); + int (*get_group_pins) (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + unsigned selector, + unsigned ** const pins, + unsigned * const num_pins); + void (*pin_dbg_show) (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct seq_file *s, + unsigned offset); +}; + +/** + * struct pinctrl_desc - pin controller descriptor, register this to pin + * control subsystem + * @name: name for the pin controller + * @pins: an array of pin descriptors describing all the pins handled by + * this pin controller + * @npins: number of descriptors in the array, usually just ARRAY_SIZE() + * of the pins field above + * @maxpin: since pin spaces may be sparse, there can he "holes" in the + * pin range, this attribute gives the maximum pin number in the + * total range. This should not be lower than npins for example, + * but may be equal to npins if you have no holes in the pin range. + * @pctlops: pin control operation vtable, to support global concepts like + * grouping of pins, this is optional. + * @pmxops: pinmux operation vtable, if you support pinmuxing in your driver + * @owner: module providing the pin controller, used for refcounting + */ +struct pinctrl_desc { + const char *name; + struct pinctrl_pin_desc const *pins; + unsigned int npins; + unsigned int maxpin; + struct pinctrl_ops *pctlops; + struct pinmux_ops *pmxops; + struct module *owner; +}; + +/** + * struct pinctrl_dev - pin control class device + * @desc: the pin controller descriptor supplied when initializing this pin + * controller + * @pin_desc_tree: each pin descriptor for this pin controller is stored in + * this radix tree + * @pin_desc_tree_lock: lock for the descriptor tree + * @gpio_ranges: a list of GPIO ranges that is handled by this pin controller, + * ranges are added to this list at runtime + * @gpio_ranges_lock: lock for the GPIO ranges list + * @dev: the device entry for this pin controller + * @owner: module providing the pin controller, used for refcounting + * @driver_data: driver data for drivers registering to the pin controller + * subsystem + * @node: node to include this pin controller in the global pin controller list + * + * This should be dereferenced and used by the pin controller core ONLY + */ +struct pinctrl_dev { + struct pinctrl_desc *desc; + struct radix_tree_root pin_desc_tree; + spinlock_t pin_desc_tree_lock; + struct list_head gpio_ranges; + spinlock_t gpio_ranges_lock; + struct device dev; + struct module *owner; + void *driver_data; + struct list_head node; +}; + +/* These should only be used from drivers */ +static inline const char *pctldev_get_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev) +{ + /* We're not allowed to register devices without name */ + return pctldev->desc->name; +} + +static inline void *pctldev_get_drvdata(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev) +{ + return pctldev->driver_data; +} + +/* External interface to pin controller */ +extern struct pinctrl_dev *pinctrl_register(struct pinctrl_desc *pctldesc, + struct device *dev, void *driver_data); +extern void pinctrl_unregister(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev); +extern bool pin_is_valid(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin); +extern void pinctrl_add_gpio_range(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range); +#else + +struct pinctrl_dev; + +/* Sufficiently stupid default function when pinctrl is not in use */ +static inline bool pin_is_valid(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int pin) +{ + return pin >= 0; +} + +#endif /* !CONFIG_PINCTRL */ + +#endif /* __LINUX_PINCTRL_PINCTRL_H */ diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bd76491 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ +/* + * Interface the pinmux subsystem + * + * Copyright (C) 2011 ST-Ericsson SA + * Written on behalf of Linaro for ST-Ericsson + * Based on bits of regulator core, gpio core and clk core + * + * Author: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org + * + * License terms: GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2 + */ +#ifndef __LINUX_PINCTRL_PINMUX_H +#define __LINUX_PINCTRL_PINMUX_H + +#include <linux/list.h> +#include <linux/seq_file.h> +#include "pinctrl.h" + +/* This struct is private to the core and should be regarded as a cookie */ +struct pinmux; + +#ifdef CONFIG_PINMUX + +struct pinctrl_dev; + +/** + * struct pinmux_ops - pinmux operations, to be implemented by pin controller + * drivers that support pinmuxing + * @request: called by the core to see if a certain pin can be made available + * available for muxing. This is called by the core to acquire the pins + * before selecting any actual mux setting across a function. The driver + * is allowed to answer "no" by returning a negative error code + * @free: the reverse function of the request() callback, frees a pin after + * being requested + * @list_functions: list the number of selectable named functions available + * in this pinmux driver, the core will begin on 0 and call this + * repeatedly as long as it returns >= 0 to enumerate mux settings + * @get_function_name: return the function name of the muxing selector, + * called by the core to figure out which mux setting it shall map a + * certain device to + * @get_function_groups: return an array of groups selectors (in turn + * referencing pins) connected to a certain function selector. The group + * selector can be used with the generic @pinctrl_ops to retrieve the + * actual pins affected. The applicable groups will be returned in + * @groups and the number of groups in @num_groups + * @enable: enable a certain muxing function with a certain pin group. The + * driver does not need to figure out whether enabling this function + * conflicts some other use of the pins in that group, such collisions + * are handled by the pinmux subsystem. The @func_selector selects a + * certain function whereas @group_selector selects a certain set of pins + * to be used. On simple controllers the latter argument may be ignored + * @disable: disable a certain muxing selector with a certain pin group + * @gpio_request_enable: requests and enables GPIO on a certain pin. + * Implement this only if you can mux every pin individually as GPIO. The + * affected GPIO range is passed along with an offset into that + * specific GPIO range - function selectors and pin groups are orthogonal + * to this, the core will however make sure the pins do not collide + */ +struct pinmux_ops { + int (*request) (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned offset); + int (*free) (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned offset); + int (*list_functions) (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector); + const char *(*get_function_name) (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + unsigned selector); + int (*get_function_groups) (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + unsigned selector, + unsigned ** const groups, + unsigned * const num_groups); + int (*enable) (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned func_selector, + unsigned group_selector); + void (*disable) (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned func_selector, + unsigned group_selector); + int (*gpio_request_enable) (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, + struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range, + unsigned offset); +}; + +/* External interface to pinmux */ +extern int pinmux_request_gpio(unsigned gpio); +extern void pinmux_free_gpio(unsigned gpio); +extern struct pinmux *pinmux_get(struct device *dev, const char *name); +extern void pinmux_put(struct pinmux *pmx); +extern int pinmux_enable(struct pinmux *pmx); +extern void pinmux_disable(struct pinmux *pmx); +extern int pinmux_config(struct pinmux *pmx, u16 param, unsigned long *data); + +#else /* !CONFIG_PINMUX */ + +static inline int pinmux_request_gpio(unsigned gpio) +{ + return 0; +} + +static inline void pinmux_free_gpio(unsigned gpio) +{ +} + +static inline struct pinmux *pinmux_get(struct device *dev, const char *name) +{ + return NULL; +} + +static inline void pinmux_put(struct pinmux *pmx) +{ +} + +static inline int pinmux_enable(struct pinmux *pmx) +{ + return 0; +} + +static inline void pinmux_disable(struct pinmux *pmx) +{ +} + +static inline int pinmux_config(struct pinmux *pmx, u16 param, + unsigned long *data) +{ + return 0; +} + +#endif /* CONFIG_PINMUX */ + +#endif /* __LINUX_PINCTRL_PINMUX_H */
Linus Walleij wrote at Thursday, September 01, 2011 3:32 AM:
This creates a subsystem for handling of pin control devices. These are devices that control different aspects of package pins.
Overall, I think this is beginning to look very good. Thanks for taking care of my requests.
I want to check one thing: A given pin can be in multiple pin groups at once. This will be important when biasing/... is added, since Tegra will then having 2 sets of overlapping pin groups that cover all/most pins; one set for muxing and one for biasing etc. Each pin will be in one of the mux groups and one of the bias groups. I'm pretty sure this is the case, but just wanted to double-check.
As you already acknowledge, one missing feature is handling multiple map entries for each pinmux_get()/enable().
My final area of contention is the GPIO-specific APIs and mapping.
The only thing pinmux allows you to do with the GPIO ranges are request_gpio and free_gpio. Some thoughts:
* These only exist to prevent an explosion in the number of functions. I don't think we need these APIs to avoid this; see my discussion below.
* These APIs don't work in the same way as mapping table entries; what if switching a controller between two sets of pins also required using a different GPIO; I might want to put the equivalent of request_gpio and free_gpio into the mapping table. This can only be done if we represent GPIOs as just another function, rather than special- casing them.
* If we get rid of the GPIO APIs, we can then get rid of the GPIO ranges too, which cuts out a lot of code.
I would imagine treating GPIOs as just another function. I'll repeat some text I wrote previously (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/26/298) about how I see this working:
SW For reference, here's how I'd imagine modeling those three cases in SW pinmux (all based on my earlier comments about the data model I imagine, SW rather than what's currently in the pinmux patches):
SW 1) Have a single function "gpio" that can be applied to any pin that SW supports it. The actual GPIO number that gets mux'd onto the pin differs SW per pin, and is determine by HW design. But logically, we're connecting SW that pin to function "gpio", so we only need one function name for that.
So here, the only issue is that if "GPIO" can be assigned per pin, we'd need to define a pingroup per pin, even if we had a set of other groups for muxing. (And a pin would have to be in its per-pin pingroup, and mux group, which goes back to my very first comment above.) I suppose this might end up being a lot of pingroups. However, this is all data, and it seems like having large data is better than having large code? Still, these per-pin groups might end up existing for other functionality like biasing anyway, depending on HW.
SW 2) Have a function for each GPIO controller that can be attached to a SW pin; "gpioa" or "gpiob". Based on the pin being configured, and which of SW those two GPIO functions is selected, the HW determines the specific GPIO SW number that's assigned to the pin.
SW 3) Where the GPIO ID assigned to pins is user-selectable, have a function SW per GPIO ID; "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", ... "gpio31". This sounds like SW it'd cause a huge explosion in the number of functions; one to represent SW each GPIO ID. However, I suspect this won't be too bad in practice, since SW there's presumably some practical limit to the amount of muxing logic that SW can be applied to each pin in HW, so the set of options won't be too large.
In https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/29/74, it sounded like you weren't averse to the idea of treating GPIOs like any other function.
A number of smaller comments directed at specific parts of the patch text are below.
+++ b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
+The pin control subsystem will call the .list_groups() function repeatedly +beginning on 0 until it returns non-zero to determine legal selectors
Given you said that pingroups are mandatory, I wonder why struct pinctrl_desc doesn't just have an ngroups field to; that'd save having to iterate over calls to list_groups to find the total number of groups.
+Pinmux conventions +==================
Just wanted to say that I agree with the description of the data model given in this section of the docs, with the exceptions listed early in this email.
+- FUNCTIONS using a certain PIN GROUP on a certain PIN CONTROLLER are provided
- on a first-come first-serve basis,
It might be better to say that pins are provided on a first-come first- serve bases, and hence pin groups too. Function doesn't really come into it; the function is just how you program the pins/groups after you've applied first-come first-serve.
+Pinmux drivers +==============
+It is the responsibility of the pinmux driver to determine whether or not +the requested function can actually be enabled, and in that case poke the +hardware so that this happens.
Perhaps augment that to make it clear that since the pinmux core handles mutually exclusive access to pins/groups, what the driver is responsible for is *just* any additional limitations the HW may impose beyond that simple constraint.
+The driver will for all calls be provided an offset pin number into its own +pin range. If you have 2 chips with 8x8 pins, the first chips pins will have +numbers 0 thru 63 and the second one pins 64 thru 127, but the driver for the +second chip will be passed numbers in the range 0 thru 63 anyway, base offset +subtracted.
Given the move to separate names-spaces per chip, that description isn't quite right.
+Now the able reader will say: "wait - the driver needs to make sure it +can set this and that bit at the same time, because else it will collide +and wreak havoc in my electronics, and make sure noone else is using the +other setting that it's incompatible with".
Maybe you want that paragraph (and some following it) to be before the first paragraph in this section, so as to more easily fix the issue I pointed out in the current first paragraph?
+Pinmux board/machine configuration +==================================
...
+static struct pinmux_map pmx_mapping[] = {
- {
.ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl.0",
.function = "spi0",
.position = 1,
This example also needs updating for ".group".
+Runtime pinmuxing +=================
...
+static struct pinmux_map pmx_mapping[] = {
- {
.name = "spi0-pos-A",
.ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl.0",
.function = "spi0",
.position = 0,
This example also needs updating for ".group".
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.h b/drivers/pinctrl/core.h
+struct pin_desc {
- struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev;
- char name[16];
- /* These fields only added when supporting pinmux drivers */
+#ifdef CONFIG_PINMUX
- bool mux_requested;
- char mux_function[16];
+#endif +};
If the API supports assigning functions to pingroups not pins, then shouldn't those two ifdef'd fields be part of the pingroup, not the pin?
Shouldn't mux_function should be a "const char *" rather than being copied?
diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/machine.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/machine.h
+/**
- struct pinmux_map - boards/machines shall provide this map for devices
- @name: the name of this specific map entry for the particular machine.
- This is the second parameter passed to pinmux_get() when you want
- to have several mappings to the same device
- @ctrl_dev: the pin control device to be used by this mapping, may be NULL
- if you provide .ctrl_dev_name instead (this is more common)
- @ctrl_dev_name: the name of the device controlling this specific mapping,
- the name must be the same as in your struct device*
May be NULL if you provide ctrl_dev?
- @function: a function in the driver to use for this mapping, the driver
- will lookup the function referenced by this ID on the specified
- pin control device
- @group: sometimes a function can map to different pin groups, so this
- selects a certain specific pin group to activate for the function, if
- left as NULL, the first applicable group will be used
Should we specify that if this is NULL, the pinmux core will error out unless there's only a single pingroup associated with that function?
- @dev: the device using this specific mapping, may be NULL if you provide
- .dev_name instead (this is more common)
- @dev_name: the name of the device using this specific mapping, the name
- must be the same as in your struct device*
May be NULL if dev supplied?
- */
+struct pinmux_map {
- const char *name;
- struct device *ctrl_dev;
- const char *ctrl_dev_name;
- const char *function;
- const char *group;
- struct device *dev;
- const char *dev_name;
+};
diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h
+struct pinctrl_pin_desc {
- unsigned number;
- const char *name;
+};
I guess the number field is required to support sparse numbering of pins. If we didn't need sparse numbering, we could assume pins were numbered 0..n just like functions/groups, and remove the number field, which might make initializing the driver's array of pins a little easier.
+struct pinctrl_gpio_range {
- const char name[16];
Why not "const char *name"?
- unsigned int id;
- unsigned int base;
- unsigned int npins;
- struct gpio_chip *gc;
That might be hard to initialize; can this be optionally be specified by name too?
+/**
- struct pinctrl_dev - pin control class device
...
- This should be dereferenced and used by the pin controller core ONLY
- */
If this is internal; perhaps the definition should be in an internal header? There's no need for clients to know anything other than "struct pinctrl_dev" since all the APIs use pointers to it, right?
diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h
+/**
- struct pinmux_ops - pinmux operations, to be implemented by pin controller
- drivers that support pinmuxing
- @request: called by the core to see if a certain pin can be made available
- available for muxing. This is called by the core to acquire the pins
- before selecting any actual mux setting across a function. The driver
- is allowed to answer "no" by returning a negative error code
- @free: the reverse function of the request() callback, frees a pin after
- being requested
Shouldn't request/free be for a pingroup, not a pin, since that's what functions are assigned to? Also, the function should be passed, since some restrictions these functions might need to check for might depend on what the pin/group will be used for.
When the core is modified to support applying n entries in the mapping table for each pinmux_get() call, how will request/free be aware of the partial pending state?
HW, and any SW cache of programmed HW state, will contain all state before any of the n entries are applied. Some HW restrictions might apply only once all all the n map entries are known/applied.
Note: I didn't review any of the .c files.
Thanks Stephen,
we really make progress now, thanks to your eternal patience with me :-)
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Stephen Warren swarren@nvidia.com wrote:
I want to check one thing: A given pin can be in multiple pin groups at once. This will be important when biasing/... is added, since Tegra will then having 2 sets of overlapping pin groups that cover all/most pins; one set for muxing and one for biasing etc. Each pin will be in one of the mux groups and one of the bias groups. I'm pretty sure this is the case, but just wanted to double-check.
Yes any pin can be in any number of pin groups.
As you already acknowledge, one missing feature is handling multiple map entries for each pinmux_get()/enable().
It'll be in v7 I hope.
The only thing pinmux allows you to do with the GPIO ranges are request_gpio and free_gpio. Some thoughts:
- These only exist to prevent an explosion in the number of functions. I
don't think we need these APIs to avoid this; see my discussion below.
- These APIs don't work in the same way as mapping table entries; what
if switching a controller between two sets of pins also required using a different GPIO; I might want to put the equivalent of request_gpio and free_gpio into the mapping table. This can only be done if we represent GPIOs as just another function, rather than special- casing them.
I actually think this usecase will work, as long as these two GPIO controllers use different ranges in the global GPIO pin space (and Grant say they should IIRC).
The pinmux core will map the pin to the matching range and pass it to the driver in this callback:
int (*gpio_request_enable) (struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range, unsigned offset);
By checking which range you got you know which chip you want to mux in on the given offset. It's true that this is orthogonal to other functions however.
- If we get rid of the GPIO APIs, we can then get rid of the GPIO ranges
too, which cuts out a lot of code.
That is true.
I would imagine treating GPIOs as just another function. I'll repeat some text I wrote previously (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/26/298) about how I see this working:
SW For reference, here's how I'd imagine modeling those three cases in SW pinmux (all based on my earlier comments about the data model I imagine, SW rather than what's currently in the pinmux patches):
SW 1) Have a single function "gpio" that can be applied to any pin that SW supports it. The actual GPIO number that gets mux'd onto the pin differs SW per pin, and is determine by HW design. But logically, we're connecting SW that pin to function "gpio", so we only need one function name for that.
So here, the only issue is that if "GPIO" can be assigned per pin, we'd need to define a pingroup per pin, even if we had a set of other groups for muxing. (And a pin would have to be in its per-pin pingroup, and mux group, which goes back to my very first comment above.) I suppose this might end up being a lot of pingroups. However, this is all data, and it seems like having large data is better than having large code? Still, these per-pin groups might end up existing for other functionality like biasing anyway, depending on HW.
Hm I have a hard time figuring out how that code would look... I'm worried that the drivers could get pretty hard to read.
SW 2) Have a function for each GPIO controller that can be attached to a SW pin; "gpioa" or "gpiob". Based on the pin being configured, and which of SW those two GPIO functions is selected, the HW determines the specific GPIO SW number that's assigned to the pin.
SW 3) Where the GPIO ID assigned to pins is user-selectable, have a function SW per GPIO ID; "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", ... "gpio31". This sounds like SW it'd cause a huge explosion in the number of functions; one to represent SW each GPIO ID. However, I suspect this won't be too bad in practice, since SW there's presumably some practical limit to the amount of muxing logic that SW can be applied to each pin in HW, so the set of options won't be too large.
In https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/29/74, it sounded like you weren't averse to the idea of treating GPIOs like any other function.
Right now I have resorted to the diplomatic solution of actually supporting both.
pinmux_request_gpio() will request a gpio pin named "gpioN" where N is the global GPIO number.
This fragment from pinmux.c sort of specifies it:
if (gpio && ops->gpio_request_enable) /* This requests and enables a single GPIO pin */ status = ops->gpio_request_enable(pctldev, gpio_range, pin); else if (ops->request) status = ops->request(pctldev, pin); else status = 0;
So if the driver doesn't implement the quick ->gpio_request_enable() the second else-clause will attempt to get the function "gpioN".
So if the driver just wants to present a single function per pin instead, it can readily do so, but it must still specify which GPIO ranges it supports.
So I think what you quote below is already possible. It's just that I support the other shortcut too.
+++ b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
+The pin control subsystem will call the .list_groups() function repeatedly +beginning on 0 until it returns non-zero to determine legal selectors
Given you said that pingroups are mandatory, I wonder why struct pinctrl_desc doesn't just have an ngroups field to; that'd save having to iterate over calls to list_groups to find the total number of groups.
This is mainly keeping to the design pattern from the regulators. It has the upside that you can dynamically add/remove pin groups at runtime, and I bet someone will have a usecase for that one day...
For regulators some voltages go away under some conditions say, I can easily imagine SoCs where some pins groups disappear when you go to sleep but others are always-on and so on. So it's pretty open-ended I think.
+Pinmux conventions +==================
Just wanted to say that I agree with the description of the data model given in this section of the docs, with the exceptions listed early in this email.
:-)
+- FUNCTIONS using a certain PIN GROUP on a certain PIN CONTROLLER are provided
- on a first-come first-serve basis,
It might be better to say that pins are provided on a first-come first- serve bases, and hence pin groups too. Function doesn't really come into it; the function is just how you program the pins/groups after you've applied first-come first-serve.
OK I've rewritten this:
"PINS for a certain FUNCTION using a certain PIN GROUP on a certain PIN CONTROLLER are provided on a first-come first-serve basis," (etc)
+Pinmux drivers +==============
+It is the responsibility of the pinmux driver to determine whether or not +the requested function can actually be enabled, and in that case poke the +hardware so that this happens.
Perhaps augment that to make it clear that since the pinmux core handles mutually exclusive access to pins/groups, what the driver is responsible for is *just* any additional limitations the HW may impose beyond that simple constraint.
Now rewritten like this:
"The pinmux core takes care of preventing conflicts on pins and calling the pin controller driver to execute different settings.
It is the responsibility of the pinmux driver to impose further restrictions (say for example infer electronic limitations due to load etc) to determine whether or not the requested function can actually be allowed, and in case it is possible to perform the requested mux setting, poke the hardware so that this happens."
+The driver will for all calls be provided an offset pin number into its own +pin range. If you have 2 chips with 8x8 pins, the first chips pins will have +numbers 0 thru 63 and the second one pins 64 thru 127, but the driver for the +second chip will be passed numbers in the range 0 thru 63 anyway, base offset +subtracted.
Given the move to separate names-spaces per chip, that description isn't quite right.
Good catch! I just deleted the paragraph.
+Now the able reader will say: "wait - the driver needs to make sure it +can set this and that bit at the same time, because else it will collide +and wreak havoc in my electronics, and make sure noone else is using the +other setting that it's incompatible with".
Maybe you want that paragraph (and some following it) to be before the first paragraph in this section, so as to more easily fix the issue I pointed out in the current first paragraph?
The first paragraph covers it, I'll delete this, it was some attempt at being educational, it doesn't work so cutting it.
+Pinmux board/machine configuration +==================================
...
+static struct pinmux_map pmx_mapping[] = {
- {
- .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl.0",
- .function = "spi0",
- .position = 1,
This example also needs updating for ".group".
I just deleted .position since specifying group is not mandatory (in that case the first group will be used), then I added an extra snippet for a function with several groups like this:
"As it is possible to map a function to different groups of pins an optional .group can be specified like this:
... { .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl.0", .function = "spi0", .group = "A", .dev_name = "foo-spi.0", }, { .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl.0", .function = "spi0", .group = "B", .dev_name = "foo-spi.0", }, ..."
+Runtime pinmuxing +=================
...
+static struct pinmux_map pmx_mapping[] = {
- {
- .name = "spi0-pos-A",
- .ctrl_dev_name = "pinctrl.0",
- .function = "spi0",
- .position = 0,
This example also needs updating for ".group".
Fixed it!
(Also fixed some other cruft in the documentation I'd missed, like the entire example implementation...)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.h b/drivers/pinctrl/core.h
+struct pin_desc {
- struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev;
- char name[16];
- /* These fields only added when supporting pinmux drivers */
+#ifdef CONFIG_PINMUX
- bool mux_requested;
- char mux_function[16];
+#endif +};
If the API supports assigning functions to pingroups not pins, then shouldn't those two ifdef'd fields be part of the pingroup, not the pin?
It's a consequence of the fact that GPIO pins need not be one-pin groups. If they were, what you're saying would be true.
Shouldn't mux_function should be a "const char *" rather than being copied?
Also a side effect of GPIO: when requesting a GPIO function name is just made up on the fly like this:
snprintf(gpiostr, 15, "%s:%d", range->name, gpio);
So in order to remember this name we have to copy it.
If that wasn't the case we would store the unsigned int representing the function enumerator and another unsigned int representing the group enumerator.
diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/machine.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/machine.h
+/**
- struct pinmux_map - boards/machines shall provide this map for devices
- @name: the name of this specific map entry for the particular machine.
- This is the second parameter passed to pinmux_get() when you want
- to have several mappings to the same device
- @ctrl_dev: the pin control device to be used by this mapping, may be NULL
- if you provide .ctrl_dev_name instead (this is more common)
- @ctrl_dev_name: the name of the device controlling this specific mapping,
- the name must be the same as in your struct device*
May be NULL if you provide ctrl_dev?
Yep fixed it.
- @function: a function in the driver to use for this mapping, the driver
- will lookup the function referenced by this ID on the specified
- pin control device
- @group: sometimes a function can map to different pin groups, so this
- selects a certain specific pin group to activate for the function, if
- left as NULL, the first applicable group will be used
Should we specify that if this is NULL, the pinmux core will error out unless there's only a single pingroup associated with that function?
Currently the semantics is that it will take the first one, half-guessing that this would be useful if there is a default group that 95% of the machines will use.
Maybe this is not true.
As it is now it will issue a debug print stating that there were several groups and it chose the first one.
- @dev: the device using this specific mapping, may be NULL if you provide
- .dev_name instead (this is more common)
- @dev_name: the name of the device using this specific mapping, the name
- must be the same as in your struct device*
May be NULL if dev supplied?
Yep. Fixed it.
diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h
+struct pinctrl_pin_desc {
- unsigned number;
- const char *name;
+};
I guess the number field is required to support sparse numbering of pins. If we didn't need sparse numbering, we could assume pins were numbered 0..n just like functions/groups, and remove the number field, which might make initializing the driver's array of pins a little easier.
Yes this has been added to support sparse pins and it's designed to be close to how sparse IRQs are handled.
+struct pinctrl_gpio_range {
- const char name[16];
Why not "const char *name"?
Yeah why not. I changed it...
- unsigned int id;
- unsigned int base;
- unsigned int npins;
- struct gpio_chip *gc;
That might be hard to initialize; can this be optionally be specified by name too?
It's just a void * actually, it's not necessary to use this pointer for anything, the core does not use it. I think it was Jamie that requested it to be added so you could optionally keep track of the gpio_chip.
+/**
- struct pinctrl_dev - pin control class device
...
- This should be dereferenced and used by the pin controller core ONLY
- */
If this is internal; perhaps the definition should be in an internal header? There's no need for clients to know anything other than "struct pinctrl_dev" since all the APIs use pointers to it, right?
Indeed. The only hindrance was the two static inlines just below dereferencing members directly. So I made them into real exported functions and privatized the struct to "core.h".
diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h
+/**
- struct pinmux_ops - pinmux operations, to be implemented by pin controller
- drivers that support pinmuxing
- @request: called by the core to see if a certain pin can be made available
- available for muxing. This is called by the core to acquire the pins
- before selecting any actual mux setting across a function. The driver
- is allowed to answer "no" by returning a negative error code
- @free: the reverse function of the request() callback, frees a pin after
- being requested
Shouldn't request/free be for a pingroup, not a pin, since that's what functions are assigned to? Also, the function should be passed, since some restrictions these functions might need to check for might depend on what the pin/group will be used for.
This is not for checking anything on function or group level. It's exclusively for things that need to be on a per-pin level, so any pin can deny being selected for muxing at any time.
So what you're saying is that you need a function to check also on group level as part of the pinmux_get() sematics?
We can add that and have two optional checks: @request_pin() on pin level and say @request_function_and_group() on the group+function level, would that work for your scenarios?
When the core is modified to support applying n entries in the mapping table for each pinmux_get() call, how will request/free be aware of the partial pending state?
That is like answering how code I haven't yet written will look like... The easiest answer is to implement it I think, then you can check if it looks sane.
HW, and any SW cache of programmed HW state, will contain all state before any of the n entries are applied. Some HW restrictions might apply only once all all the n map entries are known/applied.
So I take it that when I implement muxing of several maps per function, you need a group+function-level request callback, so I'll try to remember to add that.
Thanks! Linus Walleij
Linus Walleij wrote at Friday, September 02, 2011 6:59 AM:
I would imagine treating GPIOs as just another function. I'll repeat some text I wrote previously (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/26/298) about how I see this working:
SW For reference, here's how I'd imagine modeling those three cases in SW pinmux (all based on my earlier comments about the data model I imagine, SW rather than what's currently in the pinmux patches):
SW 1) Have a single function "gpio" that can be applied to any pin that SW supports it. The actual GPIO number that gets mux'd onto the pin differs SW per pin, and is determine by HW design. But logically, we're connecting SW that pin to function "gpio", so we only need one function name for that.
So here, the only issue is that if "GPIO" can be assigned per pin, we'd need to define a pingroup per pin, even if we had a set of other groups for muxing. (And a pin would have to be in its per-pin pingroup, and mux group, which goes back to my very first comment above.) I suppose this might end up being a lot of pingroups. However, this is all data, and it seems like having large data is better than having large code? Still, these per-pin groups might end up existing for other functionality like biasing anyway, depending on HW.
Hm I have a hard time figuring out how that code would look... I'm worried that the drivers could get pretty hard to read.
For a simple chip that allowed everything to be configured at a pin level rather than pingroup level:
Functions: spi i2c gpio
pins: A1 A2 A3 A4
Groups, with pin list and legal functions: A1: A1: gpio spi A2: A2: gpio spi A3: A3: gpio i2c A4: A4: gpio i2c
For a chip that allowed muxing to be configured at a group level, but GPIOs to be configured at a pin level:
Functions: spi i2c gpio
pins: A1 A2 A3 A4
Groups, with legal functions: A1: A1: gpio A2: A2: gpio A3: A3: gpio A4: A4: gpio GROUPA: A1, A2: spi GROUPB: A3, A4: i2c
...
Right now I have resorted to the diplomatic solution of actually supporting both.
pinmux_request_gpio() will request a gpio pin named "gpioN" where N is the global GPIO number.
This fragment from pinmux.c sort of specifies it:
if (gpio && ops->gpio_request_enable) /* This requests and enables a single GPIO pin */ status = ops->gpio_request_enable(pctldev, gpio_range, pin); else if (ops->request) status = ops->request(pctldev, pin); else status = 0;
So if the driver doesn't implement the quick ->gpio_request_enable() the second else-clause will attempt to get the function "gpioN".
So if the driver just wants to present a single function per pin instead, it can readily do so, but it must still specify which GPIO ranges it supports.
Ah, OK.
The only issue I see with that is that is there end up being a whole ton of functions named "gpio0", "gpio1", ..., "gpio125" etc. Do those functions have to be listed in the table of functions exported by the driver, or does the core expect to pass these "created" function names to the driver without their previously existing?
Whereas if you do a function-per-gpio-controller, or function-per-gpio- that- can-be-configured-on-the-pin, you limit the number of function names that are required.
diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h
+/**
- struct pinmux_ops - pinmux operations, to be implemented by pin controller
- drivers that support pinmuxing
- @request: called by the core to see if a certain pin can be made available
- available for muxing. This is called by the core to acquire the pins
- before selecting any actual mux setting across a function. The driver
- is allowed to answer "no" by returning a negative error code
- @free: the reverse function of the request() callback, frees a pin after
- being requested
Shouldn't request/free be for a pingroup, not a pin, since that's what functions are assigned to? Also, the function should be passed, since some restrictions these functions might need to check for might depend on what the pin/group will be used for.
This is not for checking anything on function or group level. It's exclusively for things that need to be on a per-pin level, so any pin can deny being selected for muxing at any time.
So what you're saying is that you need a function to check also on group level as part of the pinmux_get() sematics?
We can add that and have two optional checks: @request_pin() on pin level and say @request_function_and_group() on the group+function level, would that work for your scenarios?
Well, that's a move in the right direction, but not quite everything I'd like.
The basic issue is that a single logical function (I2C controller 0) can be mux'd out onto more than one pingroup. However, the HW requires that at /any given time/ it only be mux'd out onto a single pingroup.
To fully enforce this, the request() function needs to know what the complete state will be after the entire (set of) mapping entries is processed.
When the core can only process 1 mapping entry at a time, this is trivial, since there's only 1 change relative to current HW to process in request().
However, when the core can process n mapping entries for a single client request, you end up with:
* Initial HW state is programmed
* request() called once for the first mapping entry. This can only validate that this one request is valid against current HW state; it can't validate this call's new setting against any settings passed to future request() calls.
* Similarly, the second request() call can only validate that one change against HW; it can't validate this call against the change requested in an earlier call, or against any later calls.
The only way I can see this being implementable is:
a) Add request_start() and request_end() functions, so the driver can copy HW state to SW state in request_start(), and modify this cached state in each request() call, and hence has access to all state changes to-date in each request() call. Then, request_end() to finalize the whole set of changes.
Or:
b) request() passes an array of changes at once, instead of many calls each requesting a single .change
This is certainly a tough problem. The current Tegra pinmux driver doesn't actually make any attempt to enforce this, so perhaps it's not worth worrying about; we just assume people write sensible mapping tables.
When the core is modified to support applying n entries in the mapping table for each pinmux_get() call, how will request/free be aware of the partial pending state?
That is like answering how code I haven't yet written will look like... The easiest answer is to implement it I think, then you can check if it looks sane.
:-)
[I know Stephen is on vacation, just stacking up some nice reading for when he gets back and for others to enjoy]
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Stephen Warren swarren@nvidia.com wrote:
Linus Walleij wrote at Friday, September 02, 2011 6:59 AM:
diff --git a/include/linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h b/include/linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h
+/**
- struct pinmux_ops - pinmux operations, to be implemented by pin controller
- drivers that support pinmuxing
- @request: called by the core to see if a certain pin can be made available
- available for muxing. This is called by the core to acquire the pins
- before selecting any actual mux setting across a function. The driver
- is allowed to answer "no" by returning a negative error code
- @free: the reverse function of the request() callback, frees a pin after
- being requested
Shouldn't request/free be for a pingroup, not a pin, since that's what functions are assigned to? Also, the function should be passed, since some restrictions these functions might need to check for might depend on what the pin/group will be used for.
This is not for checking anything on function or group level. It's exclusively for things that need to be on a per-pin level, so any pin can deny being selected for muxing at any time.
So what you're saying is that you need a function to check also on group level as part of the pinmux_get() sematics?
We can add that and have two optional checks: @request_pin() on pin level and say @request_function_and_group() on the group+function level, would that work for your scenarios?
Well, that's a move in the right direction, but not quite everything I'd like.
The basic issue is that a single logical function (I2C controller 0) can be mux'd out onto more than one pingroup. However, the HW requires that at /any given time/ it only be mux'd out onto a single pingroup.
To fully enforce this, the request() function needs to know what the complete state will be after the entire (set of) mapping entries is processed.
I'm not quite following this, but I'm pretty sure that this verification can be bolted onto the subsystem later with apropriate callbacks.
It looks like you're after a state holder to avoid pinmux_get() to activate the same muxing in two different places, it's then a safety mechanism agains supplying bad mappings and doing pinmux_get() on stuff before doing pinmux_put() on conflicting mappings.
When the core can only process 1 mapping entry at a time, this is trivial, since there's only 1 change relative to current HW to process in request().
You will have this in v7 :-)
I was aware that this would cause new semantic issues, but since I think only Tegra will use that feature as of now, we can postpone this group denial stuff until there is a driver for it I think, it shouldn't be too hard to add, and you can still get the driver to a working state, it's just that it'll be possible to do some nasty things with it if you give it weird mapping tables and calls.
The only way I can see this being implementable is:
a) Add request_start() and request_end() functions, so the driver can copy HW state to SW state in request_start(), and modify this cached state in each request() call, and hence has access to all state changes to-date in each request() call. Then, request_end() to finalize the whole set of changes.
Or:
b) request() passes an array of changes at once, instead of many calls each requesting a single .change
This is certainly a tough problem. The current Tegra pinmux driver doesn't actually make any attempt to enforce this, so perhaps it's not worth worrying about; we just assume people write sensible mapping tables.
Ok we are at that stage with the subsystem now so let's wait with that until we have a driver we can fix.
When the core is modified to support applying n entries in the mapping table for each pinmux_get() call, how will request/free be aware of the partial pending state?
That is like answering how code I haven't yet written will look like... The easiest answer is to implement it I think, then you can check if it looks sane.
:-)
As it is implemented now it backs off and free all pins if there is an error on any group when doing pinmux_get().
Yours, Linus Walleij