On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Amit Kucheria amit.kucheria@linaro.org wrote:
I copied the 2 patches to http://people.canonical.com/~amitk/imx5
OK, as far as I can make out the patch does the right thing.
On Babbage 2.0 and the Pegatron lange5.1/nettop platforms, your check is triggered, and at least on Babbage 2.0 /proc/cpuinfo and /proc/self/auxv reflect the absence of NEON correctly. (I couldn't boot to an fs on the Pegatron platform --- in any case I had to bodge the machine ID passed by the bootloader to persuage the kernel to boot).
On Babbage 3.0, NEON is reported as present in /proc/cpuinfo and /proc/self/auxv.
See the attached logs.
Cheers ---Dave
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Dave Martin dave.martin@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Amit Kucheria amit.kucheria@linaro.org wrote:
I copied the 2 patches to http://people.canonical.com/~amitk/imx5
OK, as far as I can make out the patch does the right thing.
On Babbage 2.0 and the Pegatron lange5.1/nettop platforms, your check is triggered, and at least on Babbage 2.0 /proc/cpuinfo and /proc/self/auxv reflect the absence of NEON correctly. (I couldn't boot to an fs on the Pegatron platform --- in any case I had to bodge the machine ID passed by the bootloader to persuage the kernel to boot).
On Babbage 3.0, NEON is reported as present in /proc/cpuinfo and /proc/self/auxv.
See the attached logs.
Nico,
I've got 2 confirmations that this works. Do you want to go ahead and push the patch to RMK? You can also push my patch if you need an example of what your patch is used for. (Please keep me in cc)
Regards, Amit
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Dave Martin dave.martin@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Amit Kucheria amit.kucheria@linaro.org wrote:
I copied the 2 patches to http://people.canonical.com/~amitk/imx5
OK, as far as I can make out the patch does the right thing.
On Babbage 2.0 and the Pegatron lange5.1/nettop platforms, your check is triggered, and at least on Babbage 2.0 /proc/cpuinfo and /proc/self/auxv reflect the absence of NEON correctly. (I couldn't boot to an fs on the Pegatron platform --- in any case I had to bodge the machine ID passed by the bootloader to persuage the kernel to boot).
On Babbage 3.0, NEON is reported as present in /proc/cpuinfo and /proc/self/auxv.
See the attached logs.
Nico,
I've got 2 confirmations that this works. Do you want to go ahead and push the patch to RMK? You can also push my patch if you need an example of what your patch is used for. (Please keep me in cc)
OK. Could you summarize whom those confirmations come from so to add Tested-by tags to the patches?
Nicolas
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pitre@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Dave Martin dave.martin@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Amit Kucheria amit.kucheria@linaro.org wrote:
I copied the 2 patches to http://people.canonical.com/~amitk/imx5
OK, as far as I can make out the patch does the right thing.
On Babbage 2.0 and the Pegatron lange5.1/nettop platforms, your check is triggered, and at least on Babbage 2.0 /proc/cpuinfo and /proc/self/auxv reflect the absence of NEON correctly. (I couldn't boot to an fs on the Pegatron platform --- in any case I had to bodge the machine ID passed by the bootloader to persuage the kernel to boot).
On Babbage 3.0, NEON is reported as present in /proc/cpuinfo and /proc/self/auxv.
See the attached logs.
Nico,
I've got 2 confirmations that this works. Do you want to go ahead and push the patch to RMK? You can also push my patch if you need an example of what your patch is used for. (Please keep me in cc)
OK. Could you summarize whom those confirmations come from so to add Tested-by tags to the patches?
Tested-by: Dave Martin dave.martin@linaro.org Tested-by: Jason Hui jason.hui@linaro.org
-
Amit Kucheria -
Dave Martin -
Nicolas Pitre