linaro-dev February 2012

linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org

150 participants
147 discussions

by Mayank Agarwal

Hi, I want to contribute to any of the projects of linaro.Please guide me how can i contribute. Thanks and Regards, Mayank

12 years, 2 months

gcc: Thumb interworking and weakly linked functions

by Aneesh V

Hi, I have an interesting observation that I thought might be interesting to the tool-chain team. I was trying to build u-boot in Thumb2 for OMAP4. Everything was fine until I added some patches recently. One of these patches introduced an API (let's say foo()) that has a weakly linked alias(let's say __foo()) and a strongly linked implementation(the real foo()) in an assembly file. Although I give -mthumb and -mthumb-interwork for all the files, apparently GCC generates ARM code for assembly files. In the final image foobar() calls foo() using a BL. Since foobar() is in Thumb and foo() in ARM, it ends up crashing. Looks like foobar() assumed foo() to be Thumb because __foo() is Thumb. Also I see that 'objdump -S' aborts when it tries to parse foo(). I could workaround this problem by having foo() also in a C file that in turn calls into the assembly file. I tried Linaro GCC 4.5.2 and Codesourcery Lite GCC 4.4.1. Both seem to have the issue. Isn't this an issue with GCC or am I missing something? -Aneesh

12 years, 2 months

[PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators

by Rajendra Nayak

Re-sending as these patches did not make it to the lists due to issues with my 'git send-email' v3 has mainly 2 differences from v2 -1- TWL driver now uses just one table for both dt and non-dt based lookup for driver data. -2- All common regulator nodes for twl4030 and twl6030 are now defined in the twl4030.dtsi and twl6030.dtsi instead of repeating the nodes in all board files, which also means the patch ('arm/dts: twl: Pass regulator data from dt') has a dependency with the series from Benoit which adds the twl4030.dtsi and twl6030.dtsi files[1]. I have tested the patches on omap4panda and omap3beagle boards. [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git for_3.4/dt_i2c_twl Rajendra Nayak (2): regulator: twl: adapt twl-regulator driver to dt arm/dts: twl: Pass regulator data from dt .../bindings/regulator/twl-regulator.txt | 63 ++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-beagle.dts | 6 + arch/arm/boot/dts/twl4030.dtsi | 18 ++ arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi | 60 +++++ drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c | 227 +++++++++++++------- 5 files changed, 301 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/twl-regulator.txt

12 years, 2 months

12.02 efika smart book (MX?) images are totally borked

by Zygmunt Krynicki

Hi. I'd like to let everyone know that our 12.02 images for Efika are bogus: http://releases.linaro.org/12.02/ubuntu/oneiric-images/ubuntu-desktop/ The desktop image is 3MB big. The reason for this is that linaro media create crashes while trying to build it: (this is on 12.02 LMC release) $ linaro-media-create --image-file efika.img --dev efikasb --rootfs ext2 --hwpack .cache/linaro/image-tools/fetch_image/releases.linaro.org/12.02/ubuntu/oneiric-hwpacks/hwpack_linaro-efikamx_20120221-1_armel_supported.tar.gz --hwpack-force-yes --image-size 4G --binary .cache/linaro/image-tools/fetch_image/releases.linaro.org/12.02/ubuntu/oneiric-images/nano/linaro-o-nano-tar-20120221-0.tar.gz --align-boot-part [sudo] password for zyga: ------------------------------------------------------------ Installing (linaro-hwpack-install) hwpack_linaro-efikamx_20120221-1_armel_supported.tar.gz in target rootfs. Unpacking hardware pack ...Done Updating apt package lists ... Ign file: ./ InRelease Ign file: ./ Release.gpg Ign file: ./ Release Ign file: ./ Translation-en Ign http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric InRelease Ign http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security InRelease Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net oneiric InRelease Ign http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates InRelease Get:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net oneiric Release.gpg [316 B] Ign http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security InRelease Ign http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric InRelease Get:2 http://ppa.launchpad.net oneiric Release [9759 B] Ign http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates InRelease Get:3 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric Release.gpg [198 B] Get:4 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security Release.gpg [198 B] Get:5 http://ppa.launchpad.net oneiric/main armel Packages [202 kB] Get:6 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates Release.gpg [198 B] Get:7 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security Release.gpg [198 B] Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net oneiric/main TranslationIndex Get:8 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric Release.gpg [198 B] Get:9 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates Release.gpg [198 B] Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net oneiric/main Translation-en Get:10 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric Release [40.8 kB] Get:11 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security Release [40.8 kB] Get:12 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates Release [40.8 kB] Get:13 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security Release [40.8 kB] Get:14 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric Release [40.8 kB] Get:15 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates Release [40.8 kB] Get:16 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Sources [1095 kB] Get:17 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe Sources [5792 kB] Get:18 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/main armel Packages [1562 kB] Get:19 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe armel Packages [5611 kB] Hit http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/main TranslationIndex Hit http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe TranslationIndex Get:20 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main Sources [34.9 kB] Get:21 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe Sources [12.1 kB] Get:22 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main armel Packages [96.3 kB] Get:23 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe armel Packages [31.7 kB] Get:24 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main TranslationIndex [73 B] Get:25 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe TranslationIndex [73 B] Get:26 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main Sources [157 kB] Get:27 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe Sources [51.9 kB] Get:28 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main armel Packages [369 kB] Get:29 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe armel Packages [122 kB] Get:30 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main TranslationIndex [74 B] Get:31 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe TranslationIndex [73 B] Get:32 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main armel Packages [96.3 kB] Get:33 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe armel Packages [31.7 kB] Get:34 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main TranslationIndex [73 B] Get:35 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe TranslationIndex [73 B] Get:36 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/main armel Packages [1562 kB] Get:37 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe armel Packages [5611 kB] Get:38 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse armel Packages [134 kB] Get:39 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/main TranslationIndex [3289 B] Get:40 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse TranslationIndex [2265 B] Get:41 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe TranslationIndex [2640 B] Get:42 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main armel Packages [369 kB] Get:43 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe armel Packages [122 kB] Get:44 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main TranslationIndex [74 B] Get:45 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe TranslationIndex [73 B] Hit http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Translation-en Hit http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe Translation-en Get:46 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main Translation-en [52.3 kB] Hit http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe Translation-en Get:47 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main Translation-en [174 kB] Get:48 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe Translation-en [70.9 kB] Get:49 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main Translation-en [52.3 kB] Get:50 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe Translation-en [22.3 kB] Get:51 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/main Translation-en [861 kB] Get:52 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/multiverse Translation-en [111 kB] Get:53 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric/universe Translation-en [3919 kB] Get:54 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/main Translation-en [174 kB] Get:55 http://ports.ubuntu.com oneiric-updates/universe Translation-en [70.9 kB] Fetched 28.8 MB in 2min 25s (198 kB/s) Reading package lists... Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: devio flash-kernel hwpack-linaro-efikamx linux-firmware linux-image-3.1.0-14-linaro-mx51 linux-image-linaro-mx51 u-boot-linaro-efikamx u-boot-tools uboot-mkimage wireless-crda 0 upgraded, 10 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/29.8 MB of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! wireless-crda linux-image-3.1.0-14-linaro-mx51 devio flash-kernel linux-firmware linux-image-linaro-mx51 u-boot-linaro-efikamx hwpack-linaro-efikamx u-boot-tools uboot-mkimage Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) Selecting previously deselected package wireless-crda. (Reading database ... 8692 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking wireless-crda (from .../wireless-crda_1.14_armel.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package linux-image-3.1.0-14-linaro-mx51. Unpacking linux-image-3.1.0-14-linaro-mx51 (from .../linux-image-3.1.0-14-linaro-mx51_3.1.0-14.14~ci~20120203215810~4f2d074a_armel.deb) ... Done. Selecting previously deselected package devio. Unpacking devio (from .../devio_1.2-1build1_armel.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package flash-kernel. Unpacking flash-kernel (from .../flash-kernel_2.28ubuntu34linaro3_armel.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package linux-firmware. Unpacking linux-firmware (from .../linux-firmware_1.60.1linaro1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package linux-image-linaro-mx51. Unpacking linux-image-linaro-mx51 (from .../linux-image-linaro-mx51_3.1.0.14.8_armel.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package u-boot-linaro-efikamx. Unpacking u-boot-linaro-efikamx (from .../u-boot-linaro-efikamx_2012.01.1+6190+39+201202162119~oneiric1_armel.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package hwpack-linaro-efikamx. Unpacking hwpack-linaro-efikamx (from .../hwpack-linaro-efikamx_20120221-1_armel.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package u-boot-tools. Unpacking u-boot-tools (from .../u-boot-tools_2011.06-3ubuntu1_armel.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package uboot-mkimage. Unpacking uboot-mkimage (from .../uboot-mkimage_2011.06-3ubuntu1_all.deb) ... Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?) Setting up wireless-crda (1.14) ... Setting up linux-image-3.1.0-14-linaro-mx51 (3.1.0-14.14~ci~20120203215810~4f2d074a) ... Running depmod. update-initramfs: deferring update (hook will be called later) Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d. run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools 3.1.0-14-linaro-mx51 /boot/vmlinuz-3.1.0-14-linaro-mx51 update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.1.0-14-linaro-mx51 /bin/df: Warning: cannot read table of mounted file systems: No such file or directory Setting up devio (1.2-1build1) ... Setting up flash-kernel (2.28ubuntu34linaro3) ... Setting up linux-firmware (1.60.1linaro1) ... Setting up linux-image-linaro-mx51 (3.1.0.14.8) ... Setting up u-boot-linaro-efikamx (2012.01.1+6190+39+201202162119~oneiric1) ... Setting up hwpack-linaro-efikamx (20120221-1) ... Setting up u-boot-tools (2011.06-3ubuntu1) ... Setting up uboot-mkimage (2011.06-3ubuntu1) ... Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done devio set to automatically installed. linux-image-linaro-mx51 set to automatically installed. flash-kernel set to automatically installed. u-boot-tools set to automatically installed. linux-firmware set to automatically installed. uboot-mkimage set to automatically installed. u-boot-linaro-efikamx set to automatically installed. linux-image-3.1.0-14-linaro-mx51 set to automatically installed. wireless-crda set to automatically installed. N: This command is deprecated. Please use 'apt-mark auto' and 'apt-mark manual' instead. Done Cleaning up ...Done ------------------------------------------------------------ proc has been unmounted Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/linaro-media-create", line 171, in <module> args.should_format_rootfs, args.should_align_boot_part) File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/linaro_image_tools/media_create/partitions.py", line 140, in setup_partitions proc.wait() File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/linaro_image_tools/cmd_runner.py", line 100, in wait raise SubcommandNonZeroReturnValue(self._my_args, returncode) linaro_image_tools.cmd_runner.SubcommandNonZeroReturnValue: Sub process "['dd', 'of=efika.img', 'bs=1', 'seek=4294967296', 'count=0']" returned a non-zero value: 1

12 years, 2 months

Ubuntu LEB 12.02 RC images

by Ricardo Salveti

Hey, As usual, here it goes the announcement of the 12.02 RC images. This time it's later than usual because we had an issue with our builder (offspring), but seems to be all solved now (thanks to Fathi). This release includes a newer version of Unity (2d and 3d), XBMC and for Pandaboard's OpenGL ES drivers. Other than that we also had minor fixes for other boards, with improvements at the audio support as well. You can find our current test cases at https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/QA/TestCases/Ubuntu, and the 12.02 RC builds (for all boards and image flavors) at http://snapshots.linaro.org/oneiric/, with build id 20120221-1 for hwpacks and 20120221-0 for the rootfs (nano, developer, alip, ubuntu-desktop and linaro-tv-xbmc). For our four main boards we also have a testing spreadsheet, were we publish the official release testing, done by the dev platform engineers. You can find the links at https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/Testing (note that you can find the bug reports from the test cases by looking at the QA page tag links). Fathi will be coordinating all respin requests in the next following days at linaro-release m-l, and the final image will be published this thursday, at releases.linaro.org. Please also be sure to publish any bug report with the RC images against https://launchpad.net/linaro-ubuntu, or just contact us at #linaro @ freenode (https://wiki.linaro.org/MeetTheTeam#Developer_Platform). Thanks, -- Ricardo Salveti de Araujo

12 years, 2 months

[ACTIVITY] Graphics weekly status - wk082012 (20120220-20120224)

by Ilias Biris

Hello here is the status of the Graphics group. Latest meeting minutes can be found in https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Notes/2012-02-22 = Highlights = - related to the 12.02 release the group managed to release the intended components: libmatrix, glcompbench, glmark2, glproxy. Details are in the 12.02 release highlights - https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles/1202/Release/Highlights - On the Unity/Nux/Compiz front: we are discussing the way forward related to compiz-core with Ubuntu DX. There is a patch from our side, based on earlier work done while Travis was still working for GFX - in discussions this is the 'distro' or 'ifdef' patch, which is rather large and work has been going on to split it into parts. One part introduces an API which does not affect Compiz or Unity per se. The objective is to have Unity using the new API. In doing so, Unity will be loosing its fixed function OpenGL code and it will start to use a more recent part of the OpenGL API that is more compatible with OpenGL ES (it would turn the compiz package into a compiz-gles2). This will reduce the difference in code between Unity on the desktop and Unity on ARM. The point is this API patch won't be used right away when it is proposed. So there aren't any existing automated DX tests to exercise it in Unity immediately. This is an issue since the DX team are trying to achieve working unity-3d for 12.04 before anything else, and they are past feature freeze. It has now been agreed to work on getting the 'distro' patch landed as soon as possible. The API patch will be worked on at a later stage. - dmabuf plans: the points from the discussions at Connect are being collected at https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/UMM/Status, and a number of blueprints are being created and discussed to reflect the work under https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-mm-sig/ - 12.03 plans: apart from the compiz and dmabuf work which was mentioned above, the group will focus on working towards glmark2 backlog items, glcompbench + glproxy. - GFX LAVA dashboard: Alexandros has given a private demo of the dashboard to a number of people. It is clear that the tests employed are really useful in discovering regressions and issues with performance, comparing daily test-run results. The development strategy is to focus on the glmark2 benchmark first. After the glmark2 visualization is in a good state, the team will start looking into visualizing additional benchmarks. Due to the Linaro data policy there is also some polishing needed - perhaps there will be 2 versions of the dashboard with the externally available being completely compliant with the data policy. Please note that the requirement to make a private version available under permission is proving challenging, seems we would be spending much time protecting the private dashboard view - Finally related to prototyping around perf events (Mali): currently this is bit stuck in not getting much data across the GPUs (information is different between GPUs as well as the way to get the information is different for different GPUs), trying to solve this in a good way. Requires some driver specific modifications to generate the data correctly, we will continue piloting this. Questions, issues please let me know. Best regards -- Ilias Biris ilias.biris(a)linaro.org Project Manager, Linaro M: +358504839608, IRC: ibiris Skype: ilias_biris Linaro.org│ Open source software for ARM SoCs

12 years, 2 months

[RFC PATCH v4 0/4] Consolidate cpuidle timekeeping and irq enabling

by Robert Lee

This patch series moves the timekeeping and irq enabling from the platform code to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the platform irq disabling was removed as it appears that all calls into cpuidle_call_idle will have already called local_irq_disable(). To save reviewers time, only a few platforms which required the most changes are included in this version. If these changes are approved, the next version will include the remaining platform code which should require minimal changes. For those who have followed the previous patch versions, as you know, the previous version of this patch series added some helper functionality which used a wrapper function to remove the time keeping and irq enabling/disabling from the platform code. There was also initialization helper functionality which has now been removed from this version. If the basic implementation in this version is approved, then a separate patch submission effort can be made to focus on consolidation of initialziation functionality. Based on 3.3-rc1 v3 submission can be found here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg156751.html Changes since v3: * Removed drivers/cpuidle/common.c ** Removed the initialization helper functions ** Removed the wrapper used to consolidate time keeping and irq enable/disable * Add time keeping and local_irq_disable handling in cpuidle_call_idle(). * Made necessary modifications to a few platforms that required the most changes ** Note on omap3: changed structure of omap3_idle_drvdata and added per_next_state and per_saved_state vars to accomodate new framework. v2 submission can be found here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/144199 Changes since v2: * Made various code organization and style changes as suggested in v1 review. * Removed at91 use of common code. A separate effort is underway to clean at91 code and the author has offered to convert to common interface as part of those changes (if this common interface is accepted in time). * Made platform cpuidle_driver objects __initdata and dynamically added one persistent instance of this object in common code. * Removed imx5 pm usage of gpc_dvfs clock as it is no longer needed after being enabled during clock initialization. * Re-organized patches. v1 submission can be found here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/142791 Changes since v1: * Common interface moved to drivers/cpuidle and made non arch-specific. * Made various fixes and suggested additions to the common cpuidle code from v1 review. * Added callback for filling in driver_data field as needed. * Modified the various platforms with these changes. Robert Lee (4): cpuidle: Add time keeping and irq enabling ARM: omap: Remove cpuidle timekeeping and irq enable/disable acpi: Remove cpuidle timekeeping and irq enable/disable x86: Remove cpuidle timekeeping and irq enable/disable arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 96 ++++++++---------- drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 203 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 75 +++++++++++--- drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 110 ++++++++++++++------ include/linux/cpuidle.h | 26 +++-- 5 files changed, 317 insertions(+), 193 deletions(-)

12 years, 2 months

describing who can see restricted lava jobs

by Michael Hudson-Doyle

Hi all, The LAVA team is working on support for private jobs -- we already have some support for private results, but if the log of the job that produced the results is publicly visible, this isn't much privacy. The model for result security is that a set of results can be: - anonymous (anyone can see, anyone can write) - public (anyone can see, only owning user or group can write) - private (only owning user or group can see or write) Each non-anonymous set of results is owned by a group or user. I think this model is sufficiently flexible -- the only gap I can see is that it's not possible to have a stream where a subset of the people who can see it can submit results to it. Clearly it makes sense to have the set of people who can see the eventual results and see the job output be the same. Currently the former group is encoded in the stream name of the submit_results action, for example: { "command": "submit_results", "parameters": { "server": "http://locallava/RPC2/", "stream": "/private/personal/mwhudson/test/" } } would place results in a stream called 'test' that only I can or "stream": "/public/team/linaro/kernel/" identifies a stream that anyone can see but only members of the linaro group can put results in. The scheduler *could* read out this parameter from the job json and enforce the privacy rules based on this, but that seems a bit fragile somehow. I think top level attribute in the json describing who can see the job would make sense -- we can then make sure the stream name on the submit_results matches this. Does the /{public,private}/{personal,team}/{team-or-user-name} syntax make sense to people? I think it's reasonably clear and nicely terse. We should do as much validation at submit time as we can (rejecting jobs that submit to streams that do not exist, for example). Cheers, mwh

12 years, 2 months

Re: linaro blocking issue

by Christian Robottom Reis

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:49:21PM +0530, Amit wrote: > I am not able to install any packages related to linaro for example > when I tried that below command > > sudo add-apt-repository ppa:linaro-maintainers/toolchain > I am getting error like > Error reading > https://launchpad.net/api/1.0/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/toolchain: > <urlopen error [Errno 111] Connection refused> > > But when I use a direct INTERNET connection without proxy its working > fine. The problem you're running into is that add-apt-repository is fetching a GPG key from the Ubuntu keyserver, which is running on port 11371. You can indeed punch a hold in the firewall, but you can also just issue sudo gpg --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com:80 --recv-keys 7BE1F97B since this is a one-time operation -- once the key is set up transferring packages is done over regular http. -- Christian Robottom Reis, Engineering VP Brazil (GMT-3) | [+55] 16 9112 6430 | [+1] 612 216 4935 Linaro.org: Open Source Software for ARM SoCs

12 years, 2 months

looking for sources for beagle u-boot/u-boot SPL for 1201 images

by Peter Maydell

Hi. I'm trying to track down the sources that made the U-Boot and U-Boot SPL for the beagle 1201 release image: http://releases.linaro.org/images/12.01/oneiric/nano/ sources.txt says that's this hwpack: http://releases.linaro.org/12.01/ubuntu/oneiric-hwpacks/ but the manifest.txt there: http://releases.linaro.org/12.01/ubuntu/oneiric-hwpacks/hwpack_linaro-omap3… only says: u-boot-tools=2011.06-3ubuntu1 and doesn't say where I should find this version of the package. I guessed that it might be the u-boot package 2011.06-3ubuntu1 from oneiric, but that does not seem to contain the SPL code, so I'm guessing it's the wrong one. (Also U-Boot announces itself as "U-Boot 2011.12 (Jan 22 2012 - 00:52:03)" so that manifest is clearly a load of rubbish...) Can anybody help? thanks in advance -- PMM

12 years, 2 months

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
15
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-dev February 2012