29 Mar
2011
29 Mar
'11
8:29 a.m.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:07:05AM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
On 29 March 2011 10:53, Steve Langasek steve.langasek@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Konstantinos,
There must be some misunderstanding here; no license that prohibited distribution of binaries built from modified source would be considered a Free Software license, and zlib is certainly considered free. :)
Yes, you're right, the problem is that a modified zlib would have to be clearly marked as different -ie the package name would have to be different.
Well, Debian zlib is already modified, hence the "dfsg" in the source and binary versions.