25 Oct
2012
25 Oct
'12
3:30 a.m.
On 25 October 2012 02:44, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@sisk.pl wrote:
On Wednesday 24 of October 2012 13:15:58 Viresh Kumar wrote:
There were few sparse warnings due to mismatch of type on function arguments. Two types were used u64 and cputime64_t. Both are actually u64, so use u64 only.
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu fengguang.wu@intel.com Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
This series appears to be based on your "cpufreq: governors: remove redundant code" patch that hasn't been applied yet.
Please rebase it on top of linux-pm/linux-next or on top of v3.7-rc2, whichever is more convenient, and resend.
Please apply it after applying the latest cpufreq: governors patch i have sent.
-- viresh