Hi, Grant and Shawn,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Grant Likely grant.likely@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:32:01PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:10:24AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Shawn Guo shawn.guo@linaro.org wrote:
[...]
- clocks {
Do we already have a clock binding specification, which is followed by this example? Or the properties given here still can be discussed and open to change?
Also to support dynamically creating and registering 'struct clk' per dt clock nodes, I need to add a few properties to map stuff like parent 'struct clk', con_id of 'struct clk_lookup'. Is there any specification to follow, or I can draft it per the needs of my work?
The clock specifications are still in draft. I'm not willing to lock down on a binding until we've got some real implementations to back them up. If you need additional properties, go ahead an propose them.
Keep in mind when defining/extending bindings, that the dt is intended to represent hardware layout, not Linux kernel internal implementation details. Try to avoid describing things in a linux-specific way.
I will consider all your review comments and come up with V2 patch soon.
linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev