On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:58:54PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
Hi Richard,
Whenever we invent some new device tree binding support, we need to Cc devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org (Cc-ed).
Thanks for your reminder.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:16:36PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao richard.zhao@linaro.org
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi index 263e8f3..9e9943b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ compatible = "arm,cortex-a9"; reg = <0>; next-level-cache = <&L2>;
cpu_freqs = <996000000 792000000 396000000 198000000>;
cpu_volts = <1225000 1100000 950000 850000>;
For dt property name, we use '-' rather than '_'.
ok.
And I'm not sure this is correct, since these data obviously does not belong to "arm,cortex-a9".
That's why RFC.
Thanks Richard
Regards, Shawn
};
cpu@1 { -- 1.7.5.4
linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel