Hi, On 10/23/2012 11:20 AM, Rajanikanth HV wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/power/ab8500_fg.c b/drivers/power/ab8500_fg.c index bf02225..ff64dd4 100644 --- a/drivers/power/ab8500_fg.c +++ b/drivers/power/ab8500_fg.c @@ -22,15 +22,16 @@
[...]
#define MILLI_TO_MICRO 1000 #define FG_LSB_IN_MA 1627 @@ -212,7 +213,6 @@ struct ab8500_fg { struct ab8500_fg_avg_cap avg_cap; struct ab8500 *parent; struct ab8500_gpadc *gpadc;
struct abx500_fg_platform_data *pdata; struct abx500_bm_data *bat; struct power_supply fg_psy; struct workqueue_struct *fg_wq;@@ -2416,6 +2416,8 @@ static int __devexit ab8500_fg_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) int ret = 0; struct ab8500_fg *di = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
of_node_put(pdev->dev.of_node);This is wrong, the probe function doesn't increment the refcount of this node, so you don't have to decrement it here.
you hinted in one of your earlier comments as: " Also, if I'm not mistaken we have a leak here, because the refcount of these nodes is never decremented, not even in the driver remove routine. " while referring bmdevs_of_probe(..), nodes being referred, np and np_bat_supply
Whenever you call of_find_node_*(), or of_parse_phandle(), the returned node has its refcount incremented, so of_node_put() should be called after you are done with the node. In your previous patch, you called of_find_node_by_phandle() multiple times, without calling of_node_put() on the corresponding nodes. In your last patch, you call of_parse_phandle() once, and then call of_node_put() on the returned node: that's all you have to do. You don't have to call of_node_put() on pdev->dev.of_node, because you never incremented the refcount of that node.
-- Francesco