On 09/21/2010 11:02 AM, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:15:17AM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:19:49AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
o Jason Hui: iMX51 work on device trees. Need assignment. Reviewed BSP review, need to send results to Loïc et al.
It would be great to see more MX51 things on ALKML (and devicetree things on devtree-discuss). Up to now I have the impression that there is still much work done behind closed doors, which is bad if we want to have better mainline support for i.MX5x.
That's a good point and there's nothing behind closed doors happening that I have requested -- in fact, I mandate the opposite. I would assume that Jeremy has been posting device tree mx51 work to the devtree-discuss ML, and that mx51 patches coming out of the KWG and PMWG are also posted to ALKML; correct me if I'm wrong.
It may be that it's just very little happening :-/
In fact, that is the case. There has been no work on it in 4 months. The main area of work since then has been on a common struct clk to enable DT clock support.
The MX51 DT work is here:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=jk/dt/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=shortlog%3Bh=refs/hea...
Rob