Hi Rafael,
The following changes since commit d683b96b072dc4680fc74964eca77e6a23d1fa6e:
Linux 3.10-rc4 (2013-06-02 17:11:17 +0900)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git cpufreq-next
for you to fetch changes up to f13ad5d9829c060fffe5bf45b05cc3c689a2e719:
cpufreq: kirkwood: Select CPU_FREQ_TABLE option (2013-06-07 16:21:13 +0530)
---------------------------------------------------------------- Arnd Bergmann (2): cpufreq: SPEAr needs cpufreq table cpufreq: bit.LITTLE needs cpufreq table
Ezequiel Garcia (1): cpufreq: kirkwood: Select CPU_FREQ_TABLE option
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
-- Viresh
On Friday, June 07, 2013 04:26:36 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi Rafael,
The following changes since commit d683b96b072dc4680fc74964eca77e6a23d1fa6e:
Linux 3.10-rc4 (2013-06-02 17:11:17 +0900)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git cpufreq-next
for you to fetch changes up to f13ad5d9829c060fffe5bf45b05cc3c689a2e719:
cpufreq: kirkwood: Select CPU_FREQ_TABLE option (2013-06-07 16:21:13 +0530)
Arnd Bergmann (2): cpufreq: SPEAr needs cpufreq table cpufreq: bit.LITTLE needs cpufreq table
That should be big.LITTLE I suppose?
Rafael
Ezequiel Garcia (1): cpufreq: kirkwood: Select CPU_FREQ_TABLE option
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
-- Viresh
On 7 June 2013 16:41, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@sisk.pl wrote:
On Friday, June 07, 2013 04:26:36 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
cpufreq: bit.LITTLE needs cpufreq tableThat should be big.LITTLE I suppose?
Yes. This is not the first time I face this issue where big is written as bit. Even I named one of my external repo like this earlier and after a long time some other careful viewer caught it :)
Fixed my branch now with s/bit/big.
Thanks.
On Friday, June 07, 2013 04:35:24 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 7 June 2013 16:41, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@sisk.pl wrote:
On Friday, June 07, 2013 04:26:36 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
cpufreq: bit.LITTLE needs cpufreq tableThat should be big.LITTLE I suppose?
Yes. This is not the first time I face this issue where big is written as bit. Even I named one of my external repo like this earlier and after a long time some other careful viewer caught it :)
Fixed my branch now with s/bit/big.
OK, thanks!
Care to resend the request, since the commit IDs have changed?
Rafael
-
Rafael J. Wysocki -
Viresh Kumar