On 7 June 2013 16:41, Rafael J. Wysocki rjw@sisk.pl wrote:
On Friday, June 07, 2013 04:26:36 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
cpufreq: bit.LITTLE needs cpufreq table
That should be big.LITTLE I suppose?
Yes. This is not the first time I face this issue where big is written as bit. Even I named one of my external repo like this earlier and after a long time some other careful viewer caught it :)
Fixed my branch now with s/bit/big.
Thanks.